GPT-5.6 Cyber vs Hy4 preview vs Claude Mythos 5
Hy4 preview comes out ahead, 44 to 33 and 30 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Cyber
30/100- ECI—
- Price$12.50 / $75.00
- Context400K
- Our pick
TencentHy4 preview
44/100- ECI—
- Price$0.834 / $2.50
- Context1.02M
AnthropicClaude Mythos 5
33/100- ECI—
- Price$10.00 / $50.00
- Context1M
Hy4 preview is our pick
Hy4 preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 44/100 against Claude Mythos 5 (33) and GPT-5.6 Cyber (30). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceHy4 previewHy4 preview $1.25 · Claude Mythos 5 $20.00 · GPT-5.6 Cyber $28.13 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextHy4 previewHy4 preview 1,024,000 · Claude Mythos 5 1,000,000 · GPT-5.6 Cyber 400,000 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Mythos 5GPT-5.6 Cyber: Text, Images · Hy4 preview: Text · Claude Mythos 5: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingHy4 previewPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GPT-5.6 Cyber | Hy4 preview | Claude Mythos 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 0 | 43 | 0 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 35 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 44 | 60 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 30/100 | 44/100 | 33/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GPT-5.6 CyberOpenAI | Hy4 previewTencent | Claude Mythos 5Anthropic |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $12.50 | $0.834 (best) | $10.00 |
| Output | $75.00 | $2.50 (best) | $50.00 |
| Cached input | $1.25 | $0.042 (best) | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $28.13 | $1.25 (best) | $20.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | Official Tencent TokenHub API | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 400,000 tokens | 1,024,000 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens (best) | 64,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeshigh | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gpt-daybreak-red-latest | hy4-preview | — |
| API providers | 1 | 17 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Aug 7, 2026 | Aug 28, 2026 | Jun 9, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Feb 16, 2026 | — | Jan 31, 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GPT-5.6 Cyber$275.00
- Hy4 preview$13.34
- Claude Mythos 5$200.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-5.6 Cyber, Hy4 preview or Claude Mythos 5?
Hy4 preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 44/100 against Claude Mythos 5 (33) and GPT-5.6 Cyber (30). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Cyber, Hy4 preview or Claude Mythos 5?
Hy4 preview is cheaper at $0.834 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official Tencent TokenHub API price). Claude Mythos 5 costs $10.00 input / $50.00 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); GPT-5.6 Cyber costs $12.50 input / $75.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.25 per million tokens for Hy4 preview versus $20.00 for Claude Mythos 5 (16× as much) and $28.13 for GPT-5.6 Cyber (22× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GPT-5.6 Cyber has not been scored yet, Hy4 preview has not been scored yet and Claude Mythos 5 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.6 Cyber, Hy4 preview and Claude Mythos 5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Hy4 preview has the largest context window at 1,024,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Claude Mythos 5 and 400,000 for GPT-5.6 Cyber. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.6 Cyber up to 128,000, Hy4 preview up to 64,000, Claude Mythos 5 up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-5.6 Cyber accepts text and images; Hy4 preview accepts text; Claude Mythos 5 accepts text, images and PDFs. Claude Mythos 5 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Hy4 preview publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; GPT-5.6 Cyber and Claude Mythos 5 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Hy4 preview is the newest, released Aug 28, 2026. GPT-5.6 Cyber came out Aug 7, 2026; Claude Mythos 5 came out Jun 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.6 Cyber Feb 16, 2026, Claude Mythos 5 Jan 31, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
