GPT-5.6 Cyber vs MAI-Code-1.1-Flash
GPT-5.6 Cyber comes out ahead, 60 to 56 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
OpenAIGPT-5.6 Cyber
60/100- ECI—
- Price$12.50 / $75.00
- Context400K
MicrosoftMAI-Code-1.1-Flash
56/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context256K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
GPT-5.6 Cyber is our pick
GPT-5.6 Cyber is the better all-round choice, scoring 60/100 against MAI-Code-1.1-Flash (56). It leads on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGPT-5.6 CyberGPT-5.6 Cyber $28.13 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · MAI-Code-1.1-Flash unpriced
- Longest contextGPT-5.6 CyberGPT-5.6 Cyber 400,000 · MAI-Code-1.1-Flash 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGPT-5.6 Cyber: Text, Images · MAI-Code-1.1-Flash: Text, Images
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | GPT-5.6 Cyber | MAI-Code-1.1-Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 70 | 70 |
| Context window | 40% | 44 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 60/100 | 56/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GPT-5.6 CyberOpenAI | MAI-Code-1.1-FlashMicrosoft |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $12.50 | — |
| Output | $75.00 | — |
| Cached input | $1.25 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $28.13 | — |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | — |
| Price source | Official OpenAI API | — |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 400,000 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | gpt-daybreak-red-latest | — |
| API providers | 1 | — |
| Released | Aug 7, 2026 | Aug 11, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Feb 16, 2026 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GPT-5.6 Cyber$275.00
- MAI-Code-1.1-Flash—
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GPT-5.6 Cyber or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?
GPT-5.6 Cyber is the better all-round choice, scoring 60/100 against MAI-Code-1.1-Flash (56). It leads on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GPT-5.6 Cyber or MAI-Code-1.1-Flash?
GPT-5.6 Cyber is cheaper at $12.50 input / $75.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $28.13 per million tokens for GPT-5.6 Cyber versus . MAI-Code-1.1-Flash has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. GPT-5.6 Cyber has not been scored yet and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GPT-5.6 Cyber and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.6 Cyber has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 256,000 for MAI-Code-1.1-Flash. Maximum output per response: GPT-5.6 Cyber up to 128,000, MAI-Code-1.1-Flash up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GPT-5.6 Cyber accepts text and images; MAI-Code-1.1-Flash accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. GPT-5.6 Cyber and MAI-Code-1.1-Flash are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
MAI-Code-1.1-Flash is the newest, released Aug 11, 2026. GPT-5.6 Cyber came out Aug 7, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.6 Cyber Feb 16, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Claude Mythos 5Three-way comparison
- GPT-5.6 Cyber vs Claude Mythos 5Anthropic
- GPT-5.6 Cyber vs Fugu UltraSakana AI
- GPT-5.6 Cyber vs Kimi K2.8 PreviewMoonshot AI
- MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B A3BNVIDIA
- MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BAlibaba (Qwen)
- MAI-Code-1.1-Flash vs Muse Glimmer 30BMeta
