Text prompts

You are an experienced [industry] writer producing a draft for [publication or blog name].

AUDIENCE: [who they are, what they already know, what decision they are making]
GOAL: the reader should be able to [specific outcome] after reading.
SEARCH INTENT: [informational / comparison / how-to]

OUTLINE TO FOLLOW EXACTLY:
[paste H2s and H3s]

SOURCE MATERIAL (do not invent facts beyond this):
[paste notes, product docs, data, quotes]

CONSTRAINTS
- 1,200-1,500 words, Markdown headings that match my outline.
- Grade 9 reading level. Short paragraphs, max 3 sentences.
- No introductions that begin with "In today's world" or "In the fast-paced".
- Every claim traces to the source material. If something is missing, insert [NEEDS SOURCE].
- One concrete example per H2.
- End with a 3-bullet summary, no call to action.

Write the draft.

Act as a conversion copywriter. Write landing page copy for [product].

WHAT IT DOES: [one sentence, plain language]
WHO IT IS FOR: [segment], who currently [status quo / workaround]
PAIN: [top 3 pains, most acute first]
PROOF: [metrics, customers, integrations, guarantees]
DIFFERENTIATOR: [why this instead of the obvious alternative]
TONE: [e.g. direct, warm, no hype]

DELIVER IN THIS ORDER
1. Five H1 options, each under 60 characters, benefit-led.
2. One subhead per H1 that names the mechanism.
3. Three benefit blocks: heading (max 6 words), 2 sentences, one proof point.
4. Objection handling: 4 objections with a one-paragraph answer each.
5. Two CTA options — one low commitment, one high intent.

RULES
- No superlatives ("best", "revolutionary", "seamless").
- Verbs over adjectives. Numbers over claims.
- Do not mention features without stating the outcome they cause.

Summarise the document below for a [role] who has 2 minutes.

OUTPUT
- TL;DR: 3 bullets, max 20 words each.
- Key decisions: bullet list with the decision and who owns it.
- Open questions: only questions actually raised in the text.
- Numbers mentioned: table of figure, what it measures, and where it appears.

RULES
- Use only what is in the text. Do not add context, causes or recommendations.
- If something is ambiguous, write "unclear in source" instead of guessing.
- Preserve the author's terminology, do not paraphrase named concepts.
- Quote at most 15 consecutive words at a time.

DOCUMENT:
"""
[paste text]
"""

Rewrite the passage below.

KEEP: every factual claim, all numbers, the argument order, and any named entities.
CHANGE: tone to [target tone], reading level to [grade], sentence length to average [n] words.

STYLE RULES
- Active voice. Cut hedging ("maybe", "sort of", "it could be argued").
- Remove filler openers and restatements.
- Keep technical terms, but define each one the first time in a half-sentence.
- Target [n]% shorter than the original.

DELIVER
1. The rewritten passage.
2. A short change log: what you cut and why (max 5 bullets).

PASSAGE:
"""
[paste text]
"""

Write a 3-email sequence from [your role] at [company] to [target role] at [target company].

RESEARCH INSIGHT (the only personalisation you may use):
[paste the specific, verifiable observation]

OFFER: [what you do, in one sentence a stranger understands]
PROOF: [one comparable customer or metric]
ASK: [single low-friction next step]

CONSTRAINTS
- Email 1: max 90 words. Email 2: max 60. Email 3: max 40.
- Subject lines under 45 characters, lowercase, no clickbait.
- One question per email, at the end.
- No "hope this finds you well", no flattery, no "circling back".
- Each email must make sense if the previous one was never read.

Return as a table: email, subject, body, send day.