ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Gemma 3 12B IT vs Gemma 3n E2B IT vs o3-deep-research

o3-deep-research comes out ahead, 49 to 40 and 21 on our weighted score, though Gemma 3 12B IT is 210× cheaper per token.

  1. Google

    Gemma 3 12B IT

    Released Mar 12, 2025

    40/100
    • ECI123.5
    • Price$0.05 / $0.15
    • Context131K
  2. Google

    Gemma 3n E2B IT

    Released Jun 26, 2025

    21/100
    • ECI—
    • Price—
    • Context33K
  3. Our pick

    OpenAI

    o3-deep-research

    Released Jun 26, 2025

    49/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$9.00 / $36.00
    • Context200K
01 — Verdict

o3-deep-research is our pick

o3-deep-research is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against Gemma 3 12B IT (40) and Gemma 3n E2B IT (21). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceGemma 3 12B ITGemma 3 12B IT $0.075 · o3-deep-research $15.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Gemma 3n E2B IT unpriced
  • Longest contexto3-deep-researcho3-deep-research 200,000 · Gemma 3 12B IT 131,072 · Gemma 3n E2B IT 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsGemma 3n E2B ITGemma 3 12B IT: Text, Images · Gemma 3n E2B IT: Text, Images, Audio · o3-deep-research: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingGemma 3 12B IT and Gemma 3n E2B ITPublishes downloadable weights (Gemma Terms of Use)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGemma 3 12B ITGemma 3n E2B ITo3-deep-research
Inputs & features60%503560
Context window40%25032
Overall100%40/10021/10049/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Gemma 3 12B IT vs Gemma 3n E2B IT vs o3-deep-research specifications side by side
SpecificationGemma 3 12B ITGoogleGemma 3n E2B ITGoogleo3-deep-researchOpenAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)123.5——
ECI rank#151 of 165——
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions39.5%——
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics16.7%——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.05 (best)—$9.00
Output$0.15 (best)—$36.00
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.075 (best)—$15.75
Long-context rateSame rate—Same rate
Price sourceMedian of 12 providers—Median of 1 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens32,768 tokens200,000 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens (best)32,768 tokens100,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoYes
Tool callingYesNoYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenGemma Terms of UseProprietary
API model ID———
API providers13 (best)—1
ReleasedMar 12, 2025Jun 26, 2025Jun 26, 2025
Knowledge cutoffAug 2024Jun 2024May 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Gemma 3 12B IT$0.80
  • Gemma 3n E2B IT—
  • o3-deep-research$162.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Gemma 3 12B IT, Gemma 3n E2B IT or o3-deep-research?

o3-deep-research is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against Gemma 3 12B IT (40) and Gemma 3n E2B IT (21). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B IT, Gemma 3n E2B IT or o3-deep-research?

Gemma 3 12B IT is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 12 API providers). o3-deep-research costs $9.00 input / $36.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.075 per million tokens for Gemma 3 12B IT versus $15.75 for o3-deep-research (210× as much). Gemma 3n E2B IT has no published per-token price.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemma 3 12B IT has an ECI of 123.5, Gemma 3n E2B IT has not been scored yet and o3-deep-research has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 3 12B IT, Gemma 3n E2B IT and o3-deep-research yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Gemma 3n E2B IT does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

o3-deep-research has the largest context window at 200,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Gemma 3 12B IT and 32,768 for Gemma 3n E2B IT. Maximum output per response: Gemma 3 12B IT up to 131,072, Gemma 3n E2B IT up to 32,768, o3-deep-research up to 100,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Gemma 3 12B IT accepts text and images; Gemma 3n E2B IT accepts text, images and audio; o3-deep-research accepts text and images. Gemma 3n E2B IT handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Gemma 3 12B IT and Gemma 3n E2B IT publishes its weights (Gemma Terms of Use) and can be self-hosted; o3-deep-research is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemma 3n E2B IT is the newest, released Jun 26, 2025. o3-deep-research came out Jun 26, 2025; Gemma 3 12B IT came out Mar 12, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 3 12B IT Aug 2024, Gemma 3n E2B IT Jun 2024, o3-deep-research May 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.