Gemma 3 12B IT vs Mistral Nemo
Gemma 3 12B IT comes out ahead, 57 to 47 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
GoogleGemma 3 12B IT
57/100- ECI123.5
- Price$0.05 / $0.15
- Context131K
Mistral AIMistral Nemo
47/100- ECI118.6
- Price$0.12 / $0.13
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemma 3 12B IT is our pick
Gemma 3 12B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Mistral Nemo (47). It leads on capability, price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGemma 3 12B ITCapabilities Index (ECI): Gemma 3 12B IT 123.5 · Mistral Nemo 118.6
- Lowest priceGemma 3 12B ITGemma 3 12B IT $0.075 · Mistral Nemo $0.123 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemma 3 12B ITGemma 3 12B IT 131,072 · Mistral Nemo 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemma 3 12B ITGemma 3 12B IT: Text, Images · Mistral Nemo: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Gemma 3 12B IT | Mistral Nemo |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 44 | 38 |
| Price | 25% | 99 | 89 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 50 | 25 |
| Context window | 10% | 25 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 57/100 | 47/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemma 3 12B ITGoogle | Mistral NemoMistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 123.5 (best) | 118.6 |
| ECI rank | #151 of 165 (best) | #157 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 39.5% (best) | 29.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 16.7% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.05 (best) | $0.12 |
| Output | $0.15 | $0.13 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.075 (best) | $0.123 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 12 providers | Median of 12 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Open |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 13 (best) | 12 |
| Released | Mar 12, 2025 | Jul 18, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 2024 | Jul 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemma 3 12B IT$0.80
- Mistral Nemo$1.46
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemma 3 12B IT or Mistral Nemo?
Gemma 3 12B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Mistral Nemo (47). It leads on capability, price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B IT or Mistral Nemo?
Gemma 3 12B IT is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 12 API providers). Mistral Nemo costs $0.12 input / $0.13 output per million tokens (median across 12 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.075 per million tokens for Gemma 3 12B IT versus $0.123 for Mistral Nemo (1.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Gemma 3 12B IT scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Gemma 3 12B IT 123.5 (#151 of 165) and Mistral Nemo 118.6 (#157 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (116.9–128.4 vs 111.6–121.6), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemma 3 12B IT 39.5%, Mistral Nemo 29.9%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 3 12B IT and Mistral Nemo yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Gemma 3 12B IT leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 3 12B IT has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Mistral Nemo. Maximum output per response: Gemma 3 12B IT up to 131,072, Mistral Nemo up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemma 3 12B IT accepts text and images; Mistral Nemo accepts text. Gemma 3 12B IT handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Gemma 3 12B IT is the newest, released Mar 12, 2025. Mistral Nemo came out Jul 18, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 3 12B IT Aug 2024, Mistral Nemo Jul 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen2.5 7B InstructThree-way comparison
- Gemma 3 12B IT vs Qwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 118.5
- Gemma 3 12B IT vs Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-InstructMeta · ECI 125.5
- Gemma 3 12B IT vs GPT-4o miniOpenAI · ECI 126.5
- Mistral Nemo vs Qwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 118.5
- Mistral Nemo vs Llama-3.1-8B-InstructMeta · ECI 116.4
- Mistral Nemo vs Claude Haiku 3Anthropic · ECI 118.8
