Gemma 3 12B IT vs o3-deep-research
Gemma 3 12B IT comes out ahead, 69 to 24 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
GoogleGemma 3 12B IT
69/100- ECI123.5
- Price$0.05 / $0.15
- Context131K
OpenAIo3-deep-research
24/100- ECI—
- Price$9.00 / $36.00
- Context200K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemma 3 12B IT is our pick
Gemma 3 12B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against o3-deep-research (24). It leads on price. o3-deep-research wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGemma 3 12B ITGemma 3 12B IT $0.075 · o3-deep-research $15.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contexto3-deep-researcho3-deep-research 200,000 · Gemma 3 12B IT 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGemma 3 12B IT: Text, Images · o3-deep-research: Text, Images
- Self-hostingGemma 3 12B ITPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Gemma 3 12B IT | o3-deep-research |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 99 | 0 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 50 | 60 |
| Context window | 20% | 25 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 69/100 | 24/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemma 3 12B ITGoogle | o3-deep-researchOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 123.5 | — |
| ECI rank | #151 of 165 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 39.5% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 16.7% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.05 (best) | $9.00 |
| Output | $0.15 (best) | $36.00 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.075 (best) | $15.75 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 12 providers | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 200,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 100,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 13 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Mar 12, 2025 | Jun 26, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Aug 2024 | May 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemma 3 12B IT$0.80
- o3-deep-research$162.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemma 3 12B IT or o3-deep-research?
Gemma 3 12B IT is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against o3-deep-research (24). It leads on price. o3-deep-research wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 12B IT or o3-deep-research?
Gemma 3 12B IT is cheaper at $0.05 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 12 API providers). o3-deep-research costs $9.00 input / $36.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.075 per million tokens for Gemma 3 12B IT versus $15.75 for o3-deep-research (210× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Gemma 3 12B IT has an ECI of 123.5 and o3-deep-research has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemma 3 12B IT and o3-deep-research yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
o3-deep-research has the largest context window at 200,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Gemma 3 12B IT. Maximum output per response: Gemma 3 12B IT up to 131,072, o3-deep-research up to 100,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemma 3 12B IT accepts text and images; o3-deep-research accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Gemma 3 12B IT publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; o3-deep-research is proprietary.
Which is newer?
o3-deep-research is the newest, released Jun 26, 2025. Gemma 3 12B IT came out Mar 12, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemma 3 12B IT Aug 2024, o3-deep-research May 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen2.5 7B InstructThree-way comparison
- Gemma 3 12B IT vs Qwen2.5 7B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 118.5
- Gemma 3 12B IT vs Llama-3.2-90B-Vision-InstructMeta · ECI 125.5
- Gemma 3 12B IT vs Mistral NemoMistral AI · ECI 118.6
- Gemma 3 12B IT vs GPT-4o miniOpenAI · ECI 126.5
- o3-deep-research vs Gemma 3n E2B ITGoogle
- o3-deep-research vs Devstral MediumMistral AI
