Wan v2.7 vs Veo 3.1 Lite
Lowest entry price: Veo 3.1 Lite · Longest clips: Wan v2.7 · Newest: Wan v2.7. Not enough arena votes yet for a quality score, so this is a spec comparison.
Alibaba (Qwen)
Wan v2.7
- Arena1,428
- From$0.10/s
- Max length10 s
Google
Veo 3.1 Lite
- Arena—
- From$0.03/s
- Max length8 s
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Where they differ
Quality is the arena score from blind, side-by-side human votes. Price, length and resolution come from each lab’s own listings.
- Lowest entry priceVeo 3.1 LiteWan v2.7 from $0.10/s (720p–1080p) · Veo 3.1 Lite from $0.03/s (720p)
- Longest clipsWan v2.7Wan v2.7: 2–10 s · Veo 3.1 Lite: 4, 6 or 8 s
- Highest resolutionSame top resolutionWan v2.7: 1080p · Veo 3.1 Lite: 1080p
- NewestWan v2.7Wan v2.7 Apr 7, 2026 · Veo 3.1 Lite Mar 31, 2026
- Widest inputsWan v2.7Wan v2.7: Text prompts, Reference images, Audio, Video · Veo 3.1 Lite: Text prompts, Reference images, Video
- Native audioBoth generate soundGenerates an audio track with the video: Wan v2.7 yes · Veo 3.1 Lite yes
- Image to videoBoth animate imagesStarts from an uploaded image: Wan v2.7 yes · Veo 3.1 Lite yes
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs and apps
- Most API hostsVeo 3.1 LiteWan v2.7: 1 · Veo 3.1 Lite: 2
Every spec in one table
Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Quality (blind human votes) | ||
| Text to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | 1,337 ±7#20 of 48 · 27,626 votes | — |
| Image to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | 1,428 ±5#11 of 48 · 85,521 votes | — |
| Price | ||
| Starting price | $0.10/s 720p–1080p | $0.03/s 720p (best) |
| Top price | — | $0.08/s 1080p, with audio |
| 10-second clip | $1.00at the starting rate | $0.30at the starting rate (best) |
| How it is billed | Per second | Per second |
| Output | ||
| Produces | Video with sound | Video with sound |
| Resolutions | 720p · 1080p | 720p · 1080p |
| Highest resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| Clip length | 2–10 s | 4, 6 or 8 s |
| Longest clip | 10 s (best) | 8 s |
| Sound | Optional | Optional |
| Frame control | First and last frame | First and last frame |
| Aspect ratios | — | 16:9 · 9:16 |
| Inputs | ||
| Text prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Start image (image to video) | Yes | Yes |
| Video input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio input | Yes | No |
| References | Images | — |
| Access | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API hosts | 1 | 2 (best) |
| Released | Apr 7, 2026 | Mar 31, 2026 |
Which should you choose?
Which is better, Wan v2.7 or Veo 3.1 Lite?
Neither model has enough arena votes for a reliable quality score yet, so this page compares specs only. Run the same three or four prompts through each and judge the results.
Which is cheaper?
Wan v2.7 costs from $0.10/s (720p–1080p); Veo 3.1 Lite costs from $0.03/s (720p), up to $0.08/s (1080p, with audio). A 10-second clip at the lowest rate: Wan v2.7 $1.00, Veo 3.1 Lite $0.30. Prices are list rates and change often; check the lab before budgeting.
How long can the videos be, and at what resolution?
Wan v2.7: 2–10 s, 720p / 1080p; Veo 3.1 Lite: 4, 6 or 8 s, 720p / 1080p.
What is the difference between Wan v2.7 and Veo 3.1 Lite?
Wan v2.7 is a video model from Alibaba (Qwen) (Apr 7, 2026), taking text prompts, reference images, audio and video and producing video with sound. Veo 3.1 Lite is a video model from Google (Mar 31, 2026), taking text prompts, reference images and video and producing video with sound.
Which is newer?
Wan v2.7 Apr 7, 2026; Veo 3.1 Lite Mar 31, 2026.
Which generates video with sound?
Generates an audio track with the video: Wan v2.7 yes; Veo 3.1 Lite yes.
Can I run any of these on my own hardware?
No open weights. Both are available only through APIs and apps.