ZMIME
Video model comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Wan v2.7 vs Seedance 2.0 Fast

Lowest entry price: Seedance 2.0 Fast · Longest clips: Seedance 2.0 Fast · Highest resolution: Wan v2.7. Not enough arena votes yet for a quality score, so this is a spec comparison.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Wan v2.7

    Released Apr 7, 2026

    • Text to video
    • Image to video
    • Video editing
    • Audio input
    • Native audio
    • Arena1,428
    • From$0.10/s
    • Max length10 s
  2. ByteDance Seed

    Seedance 2.0 Fast

    Released Apr 14, 2026

    • Text to video
    • Image to video
    • Video editing
    • Audio input
    • Native audio
    • Arena—
    • From$0.04/s
    • Max length15 s
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — At a glance

Where they differ

Quality is the arena score from blind, side-by-side human votes. Price, length and resolution come from each lab’s own listings.

  • Lowest entry priceSeedance 2.0 FastWan v2.7 from $0.10/s (720p–1080p) · Seedance 2.0 Fast from $0.04/s (480p)
  • Longest clipsSeedance 2.0 FastWan v2.7: 2–10 s · Seedance 2.0 Fast: 4–15 s
  • Highest resolutionWan v2.7Wan v2.7: 1080p · Seedance 2.0 Fast: 720p
  • NewestSeedance 2.0 FastWan v2.7 Apr 7, 2026 · Seedance 2.0 Fast Apr 14, 2026
  • Widest inputsSame inputsWan v2.7: Text prompts, Reference images, Audio, Video · Seedance 2.0 Fast: Text prompts, Reference images, Audio, Video
  • Native audioBoth generate soundGenerates an audio track with the video: Wan v2.7 yes · Seedance 2.0 Fast yes
  • Image to videoBoth animate imagesStarts from an uploaded image: Wan v2.7 yes · Seedance 2.0 Fast yes
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs and apps
  • Most API hostsSame reachWan v2.7: 1 · Seedance 2.0 Fast: 1
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Dashes mean the data is not published.

Wan v2.7 vs Seedance 2.0 Fast specifications side by side
SpecificationWan v2.7Alibaba (Qwen)Seedance 2.0 FastByteDance Seed
Quality (blind human votes)
Text to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better1,337 ±7#20 of 48 · 27,626 votes—
Image to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better1,428 ±5#11 of 48 · 85,521 votes—
Price
Starting price$0.10/s 720p–1080p$0.04/s 480p (best)
10-second clip$1.00at the starting rate$0.404at the starting rate (best)
How it is billedPer secondBilled per video token.
Output
ProducesVideo with soundVideo with sound
Resolutions720p · 1080p480p · 720p
Highest resolution1080p (best)720p
Clip length2–10 s4–15 s
Longest clip10 s15 s (best)
SoundOptionalOptional
Frame controlFirst and last frameFirst and last frame
Inputs
Text promptsYesYes
Start image (image to video)YesYes
Video inputYesYes
Audio inputYesYes
ReferencesImagesImage, video and audio
Access
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API hosts11
ReleasedApr 7, 2026Apr 14, 2026
03 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better, Wan v2.7 or Seedance 2.0 Fast?

Neither model has enough arena votes for a reliable quality score yet, so this page compares specs only. Run the same three or four prompts through each and judge the results.

Which is cheaper?

Wan v2.7 costs from $0.10/s (720p–1080p); Seedance 2.0 Fast costs from $0.04/s (480p). A 10-second clip at the lowest rate: Wan v2.7 $1.00, Seedance 2.0 Fast $0.404. Prices are list rates and change often; check the lab before budgeting.

How long can the videos be, and at what resolution?

Wan v2.7: 2–10 s, 720p / 1080p; Seedance 2.0 Fast: 4–15 s, 480p / 720p.

What is the difference between Wan v2.7 and Seedance 2.0 Fast?

Wan v2.7 is a video model from Alibaba (Qwen) (Apr 7, 2026), taking text prompts, reference images, audio and video and producing video with sound. Seedance 2.0 Fast is a video model from ByteDance Seed (Apr 14, 2026), taking text prompts, reference images, audio and video and producing video with sound.

Which is newer?

Wan v2.7 Apr 7, 2026; Seedance 2.0 Fast Apr 14, 2026.

Which generates video with sound?

Generates an audio track with the video: Wan v2.7 yes; Seedance 2.0 Fast yes.

Can I run any of these on my own hardware?

No open weights. Both are available only through APIs and apps.