Wan v2.7 vs Grok Imagine Video 1.5
Preferred for image to video: Grok Imagine Video 1.5 · Lowest entry price: Grok Imagine Video 1.5 · Longest clips: Grok Imagine Video 1.5. Quality scores are blind human-preference votes; specs and prices come from each lab’s listings.
Alibaba (Qwen)Wan v2.7
- Arena1,428
- From$0.10/s
- Max length10 s
xAIGrok Imagine Video 1.5
- Arena1,456
- From$0.08/s
- Max length15 s
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Where they differ
Quality is the arena score from blind, side-by-side human votes. Price, length and resolution come from each lab’s own listings.
- Preferred for image to videoGrok Imagine Video 1.5Wan v2.7 1,428 (#11) · Grok Imagine Video 1.5 1,456 (#8) — blind human votes
- Lowest entry priceGrok Imagine Video 1.5Wan v2.7 from $0.10/s (720p–1080p) · Grok Imagine Video 1.5 from $0.08/s (480p)
- Longest clipsGrok Imagine Video 1.5Wan v2.7: 2–10 s · Grok Imagine Video 1.5: 1–15 s
- Highest resolutionSame top resolutionWan v2.7: 1080p · Grok Imagine Video 1.5: 1080p
- NewestGrok Imagine Video 1.5Wan v2.7 Apr 7, 2026 · Grok Imagine Video 1.5 May 30, 2026
- Widest inputsWan v2.7Wan v2.7: Text prompts, Reference images, Audio, Video · Grok Imagine Video 1.5: Text prompts, Reference images, Audio
- Native audioBoth generate soundGenerates an audio track with the video: Wan v2.7 yes · Grok Imagine Video 1.5 yes
- Image to videoBoth animate imagesStarts from an uploaded image: Wan v2.7 yes · Grok Imagine Video 1.5 yes
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs and apps
- Most API hostsGrok Imagine Video 1.5Wan v2.7: 1 · Grok Imagine Video 1.5: 2
Every spec in one table
Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Wan v2.7Alibaba (Qwen) | Grok Imagine Video 1.5xAI |
|---|---|---|
| Quality (blind human votes) | ||
| Text to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | 1,337 ±7#20 of 48 · 27,626 votes | — |
| Image to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | 1,428 ±5#11 of 48 · 85,521 votes | 1,456 ±4#8 of 48 · 137,459 votes (best) |
| Price | ||
| Starting price | $0.10/s 720p–1080p | $0.08/s 480p (best) |
| Top price | — | $0.25/s 1080p |
| 10-second clip | $1.00at the starting rate | $0.80at the starting rate (best) |
| Extra charges | — | $0.01 per input image |
| How it is billed | Per second | Per second |
| Output | ||
| Produces | Video with sound | Video with sound |
| Resolutions | 720p · 1080p | 480p · 720p · 1080p |
| Highest resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| Clip length | 2–10 s | 1–15 s |
| Longest clip | 10 s | 15 s (best) |
| Sound | Optional | Always generated |
| Frame control | First and last frame | First and last frame |
| Inputs | ||
| Text prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Start image (image to video) | Yes | Yes |
| Video input | Yes | No |
| Audio input | Yes | Yes |
| References | Images | Up to 14 reference images and 3 voice references |
| Access | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | grok-imagine-video-1.5 |
| API hosts | 1 | 2 (best) |
| Released | Apr 7, 2026 | May 30, 2026 |
Which should you choose?
Which is better, Wan v2.7 or Grok Imagine Video 1.5?
For image to video, voters prefer Grok Imagine Video 1.5 (Wan v2.7 1,428 (#11) · Grok Imagine Video 1.5 1,456 (#8)). Arena scores come from blind, side-by-side human votes on the same prompts; when the gap is inside both models’ error margins we call it a tie. Test your own prompts before you commit.
Which is cheaper?
Wan v2.7 costs from $0.10/s (720p–1080p); Grok Imagine Video 1.5 costs from $0.08/s (480p), up to $0.25/s (1080p). A 10-second clip at the lowest rate: Wan v2.7 $1.00, Grok Imagine Video 1.5 $0.80. Prices are list rates and change often; check the lab before budgeting.
How long can the videos be, and at what resolution?
Wan v2.7: 2–10 s, 720p / 1080p; Grok Imagine Video 1.5: 1–15 s, 480p / 720p / 1080p.
What is the difference between Wan v2.7 and Grok Imagine Video 1.5?
Wan v2.7 is a video model from Alibaba (Qwen) (Apr 7, 2026), taking text prompts, reference images, audio and video and producing video with sound. Grok Imagine Video 1.5 is a video model from xAI (May 30, 2026), taking text prompts, reference images and audio and producing video with sound.
Which is newer?
Wan v2.7 Apr 7, 2026; Grok Imagine Video 1.5 May 30, 2026.
Which generates video with sound?
Generates an audio track with the video: Wan v2.7 yes; Grok Imagine Video 1.5 yes.
Can I run any of these on my own hardware?
No open weights. Both are available only through APIs and apps.
Related comparisons
- Wan v2.7 vs Veo 3.1 LiteGoogle · Mar 31, 2026
- Wan v2.7 vs Seedance 2.0 FastByteDance Seed · Apr 14, 2026
- Wan v2.7 vs Kling v3.0Kling AI · Feb 5, 2026
- Grok Imagine Video 1.5 vs MiniMax H3MiniMax · Jul 31, 2026
- Grok Imagine Video 1.5 vs Seedance 2.5ByteDance Seed · Jul 31, 2026
- Grok Imagine Video 1.5 vs FLUX 3 VideoBlack Forest Labs · Aug 4, 2026
