ZMIME
Video model comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Veo 3.1 Lite vs Wan v2.7

Lowest entry price: Veo 3.1 Lite · Longest clips: Wan v2.7 · Newest: Wan v2.7. Not enough arena votes yet for a quality score, so this is a spec comparison.

  1. Google

    Veo 3.1 Lite

    Released Mar 31, 2026

    • Text to video
    • Image to video
    • Video editing
    • Native audio
    • Arena—
    • From$0.03/s
    • Max length8 s
    Full specs Remove Veo 3.1 Lite

  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Wan v2.7

    Released Apr 7, 2026

    • Text to video
    • Image to video
    • Video editing
    • Audio input
    • Native audio
    • Arena1,428
    • From$0.10/s
    • Max length10 s
    Full specs Remove Wan v2.7

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — At a glance

Where they differ

Quality is the arena score from blind, side-by-side human votes. Price, length and resolution come from each lab’s own listings.

  • Lowest entry priceVeo 3.1 LiteVeo 3.1 Lite from $0.03/s (720p) · Wan v2.7 from $0.10/s (720p–1080p)
  • Longest clipsWan v2.7Veo 3.1 Lite: 4, 6 or 8 s · Wan v2.7: 2–10 s
  • Highest resolutionSame top resolutionVeo 3.1 Lite: 1080p · Wan v2.7: 1080p
  • NewestWan v2.7Veo 3.1 Lite Mar 31, 2026 · Wan v2.7 Apr 7, 2026
  • Widest inputsWan v2.7Veo 3.1 Lite: Text prompts, Reference images, Video · Wan v2.7: Text prompts, Reference images, Audio, Video
  • Native audioBoth generate soundGenerates an audio track with the video: Veo 3.1 Lite yes · Wan v2.7 yes
  • Image to videoBoth animate imagesStarts from an uploaded image: Veo 3.1 Lite yes · Wan v2.7 yes
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs and apps
  • Most API hostsVeo 3.1 LiteVeo 3.1 Lite: 2 · Wan v2.7: 1
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Dashes mean the data is not published.

Veo 3.1 Lite vs Wan v2.7 specifications side by side
SpecificationVeo 3.1 LiteGoogleWan v2.7Alibaba (Qwen)
Quality (blind human votes)
Text to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better—1,337 ±7#20 of 48 · 27,626 votes
Image to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better—1,428 ±5#11 of 48 · 85,521 votes
Price
Starting price$0.03/s 720p (best)$0.10/s 720p–1080p
Top price$0.08/s 1080p, with audio—
10-second clip$0.30at the starting rate (best)$1.00at the starting rate
How it is billedPer secondPer second
Output
ProducesVideo with soundVideo with sound
Resolutions720p · 1080p720p · 1080p
Highest resolution1080p1080p
Clip length4, 6 or 8 s2–10 s
Longest clip8 s10 s (best)
SoundOptionalOptional
Frame controlFirst and last frameFirst and last frame
Aspect ratios16:9 · 9:16—
Inputs
Text promptsYesYes
Start image (image to video)YesYes
Video inputYesYes
Audio inputNoYes
References—Images
Access
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API hosts2 (best)1
ReleasedMar 31, 2026Apr 7, 2026
03 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better, Veo 3.1 Lite or Wan v2.7?

Neither model has enough arena votes for a reliable quality score yet, so this page compares specs only. Run the same three or four prompts through each and judge the results.

Which is cheaper?

Veo 3.1 Lite costs from $0.03/s (720p), up to $0.08/s (1080p, with audio); Wan v2.7 costs from $0.10/s (720p–1080p). A 10-second clip at the lowest rate: Veo 3.1 Lite $0.30, Wan v2.7 $1.00. Prices are list rates and change often; check the lab before budgeting.

How long can the videos be, and at what resolution?

Veo 3.1 Lite: 4, 6 or 8 s, 720p / 1080p; Wan v2.7: 2–10 s, 720p / 1080p.

What is the difference between Veo 3.1 Lite and Wan v2.7?

Veo 3.1 Lite is a video model from Google (Mar 31, 2026), taking text prompts, reference images and video and producing video with sound. Wan v2.7 is a video model from Alibaba (Qwen) (Apr 7, 2026), taking text prompts, reference images, audio and video and producing video with sound.

Which is newer?

Veo 3.1 Lite Mar 31, 2026; Wan v2.7 Apr 7, 2026.

Which generates video with sound?

Generates an audio track with the video: Veo 3.1 Lite yes; Wan v2.7 yes.

Can I run any of these on my own hardware?

No open weights. Both are available only through APIs and apps.

04 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons