ZMIME
Video model comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1 Lite

Lowest entry price: Veo 3.1 Lite · Longest clips: Seedance 2.0 · Highest resolution: Seedance 2.0. Not enough arena votes yet for a quality score, so this is a spec comparison.

  1. ByteDance Seed

    Seedance 2.0

    Released Feb 12, 2026

    • Text to video
    • Image to video
    • Video editing
    • Audio input
    • Native audio
    • Arena1,479
    • From$0.067/s
    • Max length15 s
  2. Google

    Veo 3.1 Lite

    Released Mar 31, 2026

    • Text to video
    • Image to video
    • Video editing
    • Native audio
    • Arena—
    • From$0.03/s
    • Max length8 s
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — At a glance

Where they differ

Quality is the arena score from blind, side-by-side human votes. Price, length and resolution come from each lab’s own listings.

  • Lowest entry priceVeo 3.1 LiteSeedance 2.0 from $0.067/s (480p) · Veo 3.1 Lite from $0.03/s (720p)
  • Longest clipsSeedance 2.0Seedance 2.0: 4–15 s · Veo 3.1 Lite: 4, 6 or 8 s
  • Highest resolutionSeedance 2.0Seedance 2.0: 4K · Veo 3.1 Lite: 1080p
  • NewestVeo 3.1 LiteSeedance 2.0 Feb 12, 2026 · Veo 3.1 Lite Mar 31, 2026
  • Widest inputsSeedance 2.0Seedance 2.0: Text prompts, Reference images, Audio, Video · Veo 3.1 Lite: Text prompts, Reference images, Video
  • Native audioBoth generate soundGenerates an audio track with the video: Seedance 2.0 yes · Veo 3.1 Lite yes
  • Image to videoBoth animate imagesStarts from an uploaded image: Seedance 2.0 yes · Veo 3.1 Lite yes
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs and apps
  • Most API hostsSame reachSeedance 2.0: 2 · Veo 3.1 Lite: 2
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Dashes mean the data is not published.

Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1 Lite specifications side by side
SpecificationSeedance 2.0ByteDance SeedVeo 3.1 LiteGoogle
Quality (blind human votes)
Text to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better1,479 ±8#5 of 48 · 56,318 votes—
Image to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better1,475 ±7#5 of 48 · 121,427 votes—
Price
Starting price$0.067/s 480p$0.03/s 720p (best)
Top price—$0.08/s 1080p, with audio
10-second clip$0.673at the starting rate$0.30at the starting rate (best)
How it is billedBilled per video token; higher at 1080p and 4K.Per second
Output
ProducesVideo with soundVideo with sound
Resolutions480p · 720p · 1080p · 4K720p · 1080p
Highest resolution4K (best)1080p
Clip length4–15 s4, 6 or 8 s
Longest clip15 s (best)8 s
SoundOptionalOptional
Frame controlFirst and last frameFirst and last frame
Aspect ratios—16:9 · 9:16
Inputs
Text promptsYesYes
Start image (image to video)YesYes
Video inputYesYes
Audio inputYesNo
ReferencesImage, video and audio—
Access
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API hosts22
ReleasedFeb 12, 2026Mar 31, 2026
03 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better, Seedance 2.0 or Veo 3.1 Lite?

Neither model has enough arena votes for a reliable quality score yet, so this page compares specs only. Run the same three or four prompts through each and judge the results.

Which is cheaper?

Seedance 2.0 costs from $0.067/s (480p); Veo 3.1 Lite costs from $0.03/s (720p), up to $0.08/s (1080p, with audio). A 10-second clip at the lowest rate: Seedance 2.0 $0.673, Veo 3.1 Lite $0.30. Prices are list rates and change often; check the lab before budgeting.

How long can the videos be, and at what resolution?

Seedance 2.0: 4–15 s, 480p / 720p / 1080p / 4K; Veo 3.1 Lite: 4, 6 or 8 s, 720p / 1080p.

What is the difference between Seedance 2.0 and Veo 3.1 Lite?

Seedance 2.0 is a video model from ByteDance Seed (Feb 12, 2026), taking text prompts, reference images, audio and video and producing video with sound. Veo 3.1 Lite is a video model from Google (Mar 31, 2026), taking text prompts, reference images and video and producing video with sound.

Which is newer?

Seedance 2.0 Feb 12, 2026; Veo 3.1 Lite Mar 31, 2026.

Which generates video with sound?

Generates an audio track with the video: Seedance 2.0 yes; Veo 3.1 Lite yes.

Can I run any of these on my own hardware?

No open weights. Both are available only through APIs and apps.