Seedance 2.0 vs Grok Imagine Video
Preferred for text to video: Seedance 2.0 · Preferred for image to video: Seedance 2.0 · Lowest entry price: Grok Imagine Video. Quality scores are blind human-preference votes; specs and prices come from each lab’s listings.
ByteDance SeedSeedance 2.0
- Arena1,479
- From$0.067/s
- Max length15 s
xAIGrok Imagine Video
- Arena1,415
- From$0.05/s
- Max length15 s
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Where they differ
Quality is the arena score from blind, side-by-side human votes. Price, length and resolution come from each lab’s own listings.
- Preferred for text to videoSeedance 2.0Seedance 2.0 1,479 (#5) · Grok Imagine Video 1,342 (#18) — blind human votes
- Preferred for image to videoSeedance 2.0Seedance 2.0 1,475 (#5) · Grok Imagine Video 1,415 (#12) — blind human votes
- Lowest entry priceGrok Imagine VideoSeedance 2.0 from $0.067/s (480p) · Grok Imagine Video from $0.05/s (480p)
- Longest clipsSame maximum lengthSeedance 2.0: 4–15 s · Grok Imagine Video: 1–15 s
- Highest resolutionSeedance 2.0Seedance 2.0: 4K · Grok Imagine Video: 720p
- NewestSeedance 2.0Seedance 2.0 Feb 12, 2026 · Grok Imagine Video Jan 28, 2026
- Widest inputsSeedance 2.0Seedance 2.0: Text prompts, Reference images, Audio, Video · Grok Imagine Video: Text prompts, Reference images, Video
- Native audioSeedance 2.0Generates an audio track with the video: Seedance 2.0 yes · Grok Imagine Video no
- Image to videoBoth animate imagesStarts from an uploaded image: Seedance 2.0 yes · Grok Imagine Video yes
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs and apps
- Most API hostsSeedance 2.0Seedance 2.0: 2 · Grok Imagine Video: 1
Every spec in one table
Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Seedance 2.0ByteDance Seed | Grok Imagine VideoxAI |
|---|---|---|
| Quality (blind human votes) | ||
| Text to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | 1,479 ±8#5 of 48 · 56,318 votes (best) | 1,342 ±6#18 of 48 · 165,462 votes |
| Image to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | 1,475 ±7#5 of 48 · 121,427 votes (best) | 1,415 ±4#12 of 48 · 554,050 votes |
| Price | ||
| Starting price | $0.067/s 480p | $0.05/s 480p (best) |
| Top price | — | $0.07/s 720p |
| 10-second clip | $0.673at the starting rate | $0.50at the starting rate (best) |
| Extra charges | — | $0.002 per input image |
| How it is billed | Billed per video token; higher at 1080p and 4K. | Per second |
| Output | ||
| Produces | Video with sound | Video |
| Resolutions | 480p · 720p · 1080p · 4K | 480p · 720p |
| Highest resolution | 4K (best) | 720p |
| Clip length | 4–15 s | 1–15 s |
| Longest clip | 15 s | 15 s |
| Sound | Optional | — |
| Frame control | First and last frame | First frame only |
| Inputs | ||
| Text prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Start image (image to video) | Yes | Yes |
| Video input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio input | Yes | No |
| References | Image, video and audio | Up to 7 reference images; edits existing video |
| Access | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | grok-imagine-video |
| API hosts | 2 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Feb 12, 2026 | Jan 28, 2026 |
Which should you choose?
Which is better, Seedance 2.0 or Grok Imagine Video?
For text to video, voters prefer Seedance 2.0 (Seedance 2.0 1,479 (#5) · Grok Imagine Video 1,342 (#18)). For image to video, voters prefer Seedance 2.0 (Seedance 2.0 1,475 (#5) · Grok Imagine Video 1,415 (#12)). Arena scores come from blind, side-by-side human votes on the same prompts; when the gap is inside both models’ error margins we call it a tie. Test your own prompts before you commit.
Which is cheaper?
Seedance 2.0 costs from $0.067/s (480p); Grok Imagine Video costs from $0.05/s (480p), up to $0.07/s (720p). A 10-second clip at the lowest rate: Seedance 2.0 $0.673, Grok Imagine Video $0.50. Prices are list rates and change often; check the lab before budgeting.
How long can the videos be, and at what resolution?
Seedance 2.0: 4–15 s, 480p / 720p / 1080p / 4K; Grok Imagine Video: 1–15 s, 480p / 720p.
What is the difference between Seedance 2.0 and Grok Imagine Video?
Seedance 2.0 is a video model from ByteDance Seed (Feb 12, 2026), taking text prompts, reference images, audio and video and producing video with sound. Grok Imagine Video is a video model from xAI (Jan 28, 2026), taking text prompts, reference images and video and producing video.
Which is newer?
Seedance 2.0 Feb 12, 2026; Grok Imagine Video Jan 28, 2026.
Which generates video with sound?
Generates an audio track with the video: Seedance 2.0 yes; Grok Imagine Video no.
Can I run any of these on my own hardware?
No open weights. Both are available only through APIs and apps.
Related comparisons
- Seedance 2.0 vs Kling v3.0Kling AI · Feb 5, 2026
- Seedance 2.0 vs Wan v2.7Alibaba (Qwen) · Apr 7, 2026
- Seedance 2.0 vs Veo 3.1 LiteGoogle · Mar 31, 2026
- Grok Imagine Video vs Kling v3.0Kling AI · Feb 5, 2026
- Grok Imagine Video vs Wan v2.6Alibaba (Qwen) · Dec 16, 2025
- Grok Imagine Video vs Veo 3.1Google · Oct 15, 2025
