Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Wan v2.7
Lowest entry price: Seedance 2.0 Fast · Longest clips: Seedance 2.0 Fast · Highest resolution: Wan v2.7. Not enough arena votes yet for a quality score, so this is a spec comparison.
ByteDance Seed
Seedance 2.0 Fast
- Arena—
- From$0.04/s
- Max length15 s
Alibaba (Qwen)
Wan v2.7
- Arena1,428
- From$0.10/s
- Max length10 s
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Where they differ
Quality is the arena score from blind, side-by-side human votes. Price, length and resolution come from each lab’s own listings.
- Lowest entry priceSeedance 2.0 FastSeedance 2.0 Fast from $0.04/s (480p) · Wan v2.7 from $0.10/s (720p–1080p)
- Longest clipsSeedance 2.0 FastSeedance 2.0 Fast: 4–15 s · Wan v2.7: 2–10 s
- Highest resolutionWan v2.7Seedance 2.0 Fast: 720p · Wan v2.7: 1080p
- NewestSeedance 2.0 FastSeedance 2.0 Fast Apr 14, 2026 · Wan v2.7 Apr 7, 2026
- Widest inputsSame inputsSeedance 2.0 Fast: Text prompts, Reference images, Audio, Video · Wan v2.7: Text prompts, Reference images, Audio, Video
- Native audioBoth generate soundGenerates an audio track with the video: Seedance 2.0 Fast yes · Wan v2.7 yes
- Image to videoBoth animate imagesStarts from an uploaded image: Seedance 2.0 Fast yes · Wan v2.7 yes
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs and apps
- Most API hostsSame reachSeedance 2.0 Fast: 1 · Wan v2.7: 1
Every spec in one table
Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Quality (blind human votes) | ||
| Text to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | — | 1,337 ±7#20 of 48 · 27,626 votes |
| Image to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better | — | 1,428 ±5#11 of 48 · 85,521 votes |
| Price | ||
| Starting price | $0.04/s 480p (best) | $0.10/s 720p–1080p |
| 10-second clip | $0.404at the starting rate (best) | $1.00at the starting rate |
| How it is billed | Billed per video token. | Per second |
| Output | ||
| Produces | Video with sound | Video with sound |
| Resolutions | 480p · 720p | 720p · 1080p |
| Highest resolution | 720p | 1080p (best) |
| Clip length | 4–15 s | 2–10 s |
| Longest clip | 15 s (best) | 10 s |
| Sound | Optional | Optional |
| Frame control | First and last frame | First and last frame |
| Inputs | ||
| Text prompts | Yes | Yes |
| Start image (image to video) | Yes | Yes |
| Video input | Yes | Yes |
| Audio input | Yes | Yes |
| References | Image, video and audio | Images |
| Access | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API hosts | 1 | 1 |
| Released | Apr 14, 2026 | Apr 7, 2026 |
Which should you choose?
Which is better, Seedance 2.0 Fast or Wan v2.7?
Neither model has enough arena votes for a reliable quality score yet, so this page compares specs only. Run the same three or four prompts through each and judge the results.
Which is cheaper?
Seedance 2.0 Fast costs from $0.04/s (480p); Wan v2.7 costs from $0.10/s (720p–1080p). A 10-second clip at the lowest rate: Seedance 2.0 Fast $0.404, Wan v2.7 $1.00. Prices are list rates and change often; check the lab before budgeting.
How long can the videos be, and at what resolution?
Seedance 2.0 Fast: 4–15 s, 480p / 720p; Wan v2.7: 2–10 s, 720p / 1080p.
What is the difference between Seedance 2.0 Fast and Wan v2.7?
Seedance 2.0 Fast is a video model from ByteDance Seed (Apr 14, 2026), taking text prompts, reference images, audio and video and producing video with sound. Wan v2.7 is a video model from Alibaba (Qwen) (Apr 7, 2026), taking text prompts, reference images, audio and video and producing video with sound.
Which is newer?
Seedance 2.0 Fast Apr 14, 2026; Wan v2.7 Apr 7, 2026.
Which generates video with sound?
Generates an audio track with the video: Seedance 2.0 Fast yes; Wan v2.7 yes.
Can I run any of these on my own hardware?
No open weights. Both are available only through APIs and apps.