Qwen-VL OCR vs Llama-3.2-3B
Qwen-VL OCR comes out ahead, 55 to 50 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen-VL OCR
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.07 / $0.16
- Context34K
MetaLlama-3.2-3B
50/100- ECI—
- Price$0.051 / $0.333
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen-VL OCR is our pick
Qwen-VL OCR is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Llama-3.2-3B (50). It leads on price and inputs & features. Llama-3.2-3B wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen-VL OCRQwen-VL OCR $0.092 · Llama-3.2-3B $0.121 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLlama-3.2-3BLlama-3.2-3B 131,072 · Qwen-VL OCR 34,096 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen-VL OCRQwen-VL OCR: Text, Images · Llama-3.2-3B: Text
- Self-hostingLlama-3.2-3BPublishes downloadable weights (Llama 3.2 Community License)
| Measure | Weight | Qwen-VL OCR | Llama-3.2-3B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 95 | 89 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 0 |
| Context window | 20% | 1 | 25 |
| Overall | 100% | 55/100 | 50/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen-VL OCRAlibaba (Qwen) | Llama-3.2-3BMeta |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.07 | $0.051 (best) |
| Output | $0.16 (best) | $0.333 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.092 (best) | $0.121 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Median of 6 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 34,096 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | 8,192 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | No |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenLlama 3.2 Community License |
| API model ID | qwen-vl-ocr | — |
| API providers | 1 | 6 (best) |
| Released | Oct 28, 2024 | Sep 25, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2024 | Dec 2023 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen-VL OCR$1.02
- Llama-3.2-3B$1.17
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen-VL OCR or Llama-3.2-3B?
Qwen-VL OCR is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Llama-3.2-3B (50). It leads on price and inputs & features. Llama-3.2-3B wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen-VL OCR or Llama-3.2-3B?
Qwen-VL OCR is cheaper at $0.07 input / $0.16 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Llama-3.2-3B costs $0.051 input / $0.333 output per million tokens (median across 6 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.092 per million tokens for Qwen-VL OCR versus $0.121 for Llama-3.2-3B (1.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen-VL OCR has not been scored yet and Llama-3.2-3B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen-VL OCR and Llama-3.2-3B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen-VL OCR and Llama-3.2-3B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama-3.2-3B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 34,096 for Qwen-VL OCR. Maximum output per response: Qwen-VL OCR up to 4,096, Llama-3.2-3B up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen-VL OCR accepts text and images; Llama-3.2-3B accepts text. Qwen-VL OCR handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Llama-3.2-3B publishes its weights (Llama 3.2 Community License) and can be self-hosted; Qwen-VL OCR is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen-VL OCR is the newest, released Oct 28, 2024. Llama-3.2-3B came out Sep 25, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen-VL OCR Apr 2024, Llama-3.2-3B Dec 2023.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
