Llama-3.2-3B vs solar-mini
solar-mini comes out ahead, 52 to 49 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
MetaLlama-3.2-3B
49/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.335
- Context131K
- Our pick
Upstage
solar-mini
52/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context33K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
solar-mini is our pick
solar-mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Llama-3.2-3B (49). It leads on inputs & features. Llama-3.2-3B wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest pricesolar-minisolar-mini $0.15 · Llama-3.2-3B $0.159 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextLlama-3.2-3BLlama-3.2-3B 131,072 · solar-mini 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsLlama-3.2-3B: Text · solar-mini: Text
- Self-hostingLlama-3.2-3BPublishes downloadable weights (Llama 3.2 Community License)
| Measure | Weight | Llama-3.2-3B | solar-mini |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 88 | 89 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 0 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 49/100 | 52/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Llama-3.2-3BMeta | solar-miniUpstage |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.10 (best) | $0.15 |
| Output | $0.335 | $0.15 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.159 | $0.15 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Official Upstage API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens (best) | 4,096 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenLlama 3.2 Community License | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | solar-mini |
| API providers | 3 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Sep 25, 2024 | Jun 12, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2023 | Sep 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Llama-3.2-3B$1.67
- solar-mini$1.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Llama-3.2-3B or solar-mini?
solar-mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against Llama-3.2-3B (49). It leads on inputs & features. Llama-3.2-3B wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Llama-3.2-3B or solar-mini?
solar-mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). Llama-3.2-3B costs $0.10 input / $0.335 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for solar-mini versus $0.159 for Llama-3.2-3B (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Llama-3.2-3B has not been scored yet and solar-mini has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Llama-3.2-3B and solar-mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Llama-3.2-3B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Llama-3.2-3B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 32,768 for solar-mini. Maximum output per response: Llama-3.2-3B up to 8,192, solar-mini up to 4,096 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Llama-3.2-3B accepts text; solar-mini accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Llama-3.2-3B publishes its weights (Llama 3.2 Community License) and can be self-hosted; solar-mini is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Llama-3.2-3B is the newest, released Sep 25, 2024. solar-mini came out Jun 12, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Llama-3.2-3B Dec 2023, solar-mini Sep 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
