MiMo-V2-Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
MiMo-V2-Pro comes out ahead, 42 to 39 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
XiaomiMiMo-V2-Pro
42/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $3.00
- Context1.05M
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro
39/100- ECI—
- Price$1.60 / $3.30
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
MiMo-V2-Pro is our pick
MiMo-V2-Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 42/100 against DeepSeek V4 Pro (39). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiMo-V2-ProMiMo-V2-Pro $1.50 · DeepSeek V4 Pro $2.03 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2-ProMiMo-V2-Pro 1,048,576 · DeepSeek V4 Pro 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsMiMo-V2-Pro: Text · DeepSeek V4 Pro: Text
- Self-hostingDeepSeek V4 ProPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | MiMo-V2-Pro | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 40 | 34 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 42/100 | 39/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiMo-V2-ProXiaomi | DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.00 (best) | $1.60 |
| Output | $3.00 (best) | $3.30 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.50 (best) | $2.03 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 56 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 384,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 2 | 58 (best) |
| Released | Mar 18, 2026 | Apr 24, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2024 | May 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiMo-V2-Pro$16.00
- DeepSeek V4 Pro$22.60
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiMo-V2-Pro or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 42/100 against DeepSeek V4 Pro (39). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $1.00 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.60 input / $3.30 output per million tokens (median across 56 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.50 per million tokens for MiMo-V2-Pro versus $2.03 for DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. MiMo-V2-Pro has not been scored yet and DeepSeek V4 Pro has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2-Pro and DeepSeek V4 Pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for DeepSeek V4 Pro. Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2-Pro up to 131,072, DeepSeek V4 Pro up to 384,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiMo-V2-Pro accepts text; DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
DeepSeek V4 Pro publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; MiMo-V2-Pro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the newest, released Apr 24, 2026. MiMo-V2-Pro came out Mar 18, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2-Pro Dec 2024, DeepSeek V4 Pro May 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)Three-way comparison
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)xAI
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs GLM-5-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs Relace SearchRelace
- MiMo-V2-Pro vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogle
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogle
- DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM-5V-TurboZ.ai (Zhipu)
