MiMo-V2-Pro vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) comes out ahead, 52 to 42 and 39 on our weighted score.
XiaomiMiMo-V2-Pro
42/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $3.00
- Context1.05M
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro
39/100- ECI—
- Price$1.60 / $3.30
- Context1M
- Our pick
xAIGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)
52/100- ECI—
- Price$1.25 / $2.50
- Context1M
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is our pick
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against MiMo-V2-Pro (42) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (39). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiMo-V2-ProMiMo-V2-Pro $1.50 · Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) $1.56 · DeepSeek V4 Pro $2.03 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiMo-V2-ProMiMo-V2-Pro 1,048,576 · DeepSeek V4 Pro 1,000,000 · Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGrok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)MiMo-V2-Pro: Text · DeepSeek V4 Pro: Text · Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning): Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingDeepSeek V4 ProPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | MiMo-V2-Pro | DeepSeek V4 Pro | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 40 | 34 | 39 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 61 | 60 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 42/100 | 39/100 | 52/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | MiMo-V2-ProXiaomi | DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek | Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)xAI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.00 (best) | $1.60 | $1.25 |
| Output | $3.00 | $3.30 | $2.50 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.20 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.50 (best) | $2.03 | $1.56 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Over 200K: $2.50 / $5.00 |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 56 providers | Official xAI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 384,000 tokens (best) | 30,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — | grok-4.20-0309-non-reasoning |
| API providers | 2 | 58 (best) | 13 |
| Released | Mar 18, 2026 | Apr 24, 2026 | Mar 9, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Dec 2024 | May 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- MiMo-V2-Pro$16.00
- DeepSeek V4 Pro$22.60
- Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)$17.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: MiMo-V2-Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)?
Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is the better all-round choice, scoring 52/100 against MiMo-V2-Pro (42) and DeepSeek V4 Pro (39). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2-Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro or Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning)?
MiMo-V2-Pro is cheaper at $1.00 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) costs $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price); DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.60 input / $3.30 output per million tokens (median across 56 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.50 per million tokens for MiMo-V2-Pro versus $1.56 for Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) (1× as much) and $2.03 for DeepSeek V4 Pro (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. MiMo-V2-Pro has not been scored yet, DeepSeek V4 Pro has not been scored yet and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for MiMo-V2-Pro, DeepSeek V4 Pro and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for DeepSeek V4 Pro and 1,000,000 for Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning). Maximum output per response: MiMo-V2-Pro up to 131,072, DeepSeek V4 Pro up to 384,000, Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) up to 30,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
MiMo-V2-Pro accepts text; DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts text; Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) accepts text, images and PDFs. Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
DeepSeek V4 Pro publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; MiMo-V2-Pro and Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) is proprietary.
Which is newer?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the newest, released Apr 24, 2026. MiMo-V2-Pro came out Mar 18, 2026; Grok 4.20 (Non-Reasoning) came out Mar 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: MiMo-V2-Pro Dec 2024, DeepSeek V4 Pro May 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
