LFM2 24B A2B vs Command A Plus
LFM2 24B A2B comes out ahead, 58 to 35 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
Liquid AILFM2 24B A2B
58/100- ECI—
- Price$0.03 / $0.12
- Context33K
CohereCommand A Plus
35/100- ECI—
- Price$2.50 / $10.00
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
LFM2 24B A2B is our pick
LFM2 24B A2B is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Command A Plus (35). It leads on price. Command A Plus wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceLFM2 24B A2BLFM2 24B A2B $0.052 · Command A Plus $4.38 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextCommand A PlusCommand A Plus 128,000 · LFM2 24B A2B 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsCommand A PlusLFM2 24B A2B: Text · Command A Plus: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | LFM2 24B A2B | Command A Plus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 19 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 0 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 58/100 | 35/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | LFM2 24B A2BLiquid AI | Command A PlusCohere |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.03 (best) | $2.50 |
| Output | $0.12 (best) | $10.00 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.052 (best) | $4.38 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Cohere API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 64,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenLFM Open License v1.0 | Open |
| API model ID | — | command-a-plus-05-2026 |
| API providers | 1 | 3 (best) |
| Released | Feb 24, 2026 | May 20, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Apr 1, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- LFM2 24B A2B$0.54
- Command A Plus$45.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: LFM2 24B A2B or Command A Plus?
LFM2 24B A2B is the better all-round choice, scoring 58/100 against Command A Plus (35). It leads on price. Command A Plus wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, LFM2 24B A2B or Command A Plus?
LFM2 24B A2B is cheaper at $0.03 input / $0.12 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Command A Plus costs $2.50 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.052 per million tokens for LFM2 24B A2B versus $4.38 for Command A Plus (83× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. LFM2 24B A2B has not been scored yet and Command A Plus has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for LFM2 24B A2B and Command A Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Command A Plus has the largest context window at 128,000 tokens, against 32,768 for LFM2 24B A2B. Maximum output per response: LFM2 24B A2B up to 32,768, Command A Plus up to 64,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
LFM2 24B A2B accepts text; Command A Plus accepts text and images. Command A Plus handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (LFM Open License v1.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Command A Plus is the newest, released May 20, 2026. LFM2 24B A2B came out Feb 24, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Command A Plus Apr 1, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen3.5 4BThree-way comparison
- LFM2 24B A2B vs Qwen3.5 4BAlibaba (Qwen)
- LFM2 24B A2B vs Gemma 4 E2B ITGoogle
- LFM2 24B A2B vs Schematron V2 TurboInference.net
- LFM2 24B A2B vs AutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Command A Plus vs Aion-3.0Aion Labs
- Command A Plus vs Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshot AI
