LFM2 24B A2B vs AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual
Too close to call on our weighted score (AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual 60, LFM2 24B A2B 58). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Liquid AILFM2 24B A2B
58/100- ECI—
- Price$0.03 / $0.12
- Context33K
Z.ai (Zhipu)AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual
60/100- ECI—
- Price$0.035 / $0.138
- Context66K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual 60/100, LFM2 24B A2B 58/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: LFM2 24B A2B on price and AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceLFM2 24B A2BLFM2 24B A2B $0.052 · AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual $0.061 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualAutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual 65,536 · LFM2 24B A2B 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsAutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualLFM2 24B A2B: Text · AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual: Text, Images
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | LFM2 24B A2B | AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 0 | 12 |
| Overall | 100% | 58/100 | 60/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | LFM2 24B A2BLiquid AI | AutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualZ.ai (Zhipu) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.03 (best) | $0.035 |
| Output | $0.12 (best) | $0.138 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.052 (best) | $0.061 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenLFM Open License v1.0 | OpenMIT |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 1 | 2 (best) |
| Released | Feb 24, 2026 | Dec 10, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- LFM2 24B A2B$0.54
- AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual$0.626
Which should you choose?
Which is better: LFM2 24B A2B or AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual 60/100, LFM2 24B A2B 58/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: LFM2 24B A2B on price and AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, LFM2 24B A2B or AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual?
LFM2 24B A2B is cheaper at $0.03 input / $0.12 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual costs $0.035 input / $0.138 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.052 per million tokens for LFM2 24B A2B versus $0.061 for AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual (1.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. LFM2 24B A2B has not been scored yet and AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for LFM2 24B A2B and AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual has the largest context window at 65,536 tokens, against 32,768 for LFM2 24B A2B. Maximum output per response: LFM2 24B A2B up to 32,768, AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
LFM2 24B A2B accepts text; AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual accepts text and images. AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (LFM Open License v1.0 and MIT), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
LFM2 24B A2B is the newest, released Feb 24, 2026. AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual came out Dec 10, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Qwen3.5 4BThree-way comparison
- LFM2 24B A2B vs Qwen3.5 4BAlibaba (Qwen)
- LFM2 24B A2B vs Gemma 4 E2B ITGoogle
- LFM2 24B A2B vs Schematron V2 TurboInference.net
- AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual vs Trinity MiniArcee AI
- AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual vs Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)Alibaba (Qwen)
- AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual vs Schematron V2 TurboInference.net
