ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs Inkling Small

Too close to call on our weighted score (Inkling Small 68, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 67). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. xAI

    Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)

    Released Mar 9, 2026

    67/100
    • ECI152.3
    • Price$1.25 / $2.50
    • Context1M
  2. Thinking Machines

    Inkling Small

    Released Jul 30, 2026

    68/100
    • ECI150.5
    • Price$0.58 / $1.44
    • Context1.05M
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Inkling Small 68/100, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 67/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) for raw capability, Inkling Small on price and Inkling Small for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 152.3 · Inkling Small 150.5
  • Lowest priceInkling SmallInkling Small $0.795 · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) $1.56 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextInkling SmallInkling Small 1,048,576 · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 1,000,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsGrok 4.20 (Reasoning): Text, Images, PDFs · Inkling Small: Text, Images, Audio
  • Self-hostingInkling SmallPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)Inkling Small
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%7977
Price25%3952
Inputs & features15%8070
Context window10%6061
Overall100%67/10068/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs Inkling Small specifications side by side
SpecificationGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)xAIInkling SmallThinking Machines
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)152.3 (best)150.5
ECI rank#51 of 165 (best)#58 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions89.3% (best)88.5%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics44.9%46.3% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics92.2% (best)90.0%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions30.2% (best)19.1%
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25$0.58 (best)
Output$2.50$1.44 (best)
Cached input$0.20$0.116 (best)
Blended (3:1)$1.56$0.795 (best)
Long-context rateOver 200K: $2.50 / $5.00Same rate
Price sourceOfficial xAI APIOfficial Thinking Machines API
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output30,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsYesNo
AudioNoYes
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYesYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenApache-2.0
API model IDgrok-4.20-0309-reasoningthinkingmachines/Inkling-Small
API providers15 (best)12
ReleasedMar 9, 2026Jul 30, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)$17.50
  • Inkling Small$8.68
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) or Inkling Small?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Inkling Small 68/100, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 67/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) for raw capability, Inkling Small on price and Inkling Small for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) or Inkling Small?

Inkling Small is cheaper at $0.58 input / $1.44 output per million tokens (official Thinking Machines API price). Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) costs $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.795 per million tokens for Inkling Small versus $1.56 for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) (2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 152.3 (#51 of 165) and Inkling Small 150.5 (#58 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (149.5–154.7 vs 147.7–152.4), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 89.3%, Inkling Small 88.5%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Inkling Small 46.3%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 44.9%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 92.2%, Inkling Small 90.0%; SimpleQA Verified — Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 30.2%, Inkling Small 19.1%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) and Inkling Small yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling Small has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning). Maximum output per response: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) up to 30,000, Inkling Small up to 1,048,576 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) accepts text, images and PDFs; Inkling Small accepts text, images and audio. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Inkling Small publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Inkling Small is the newest, released Jul 30, 2026. Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) came out Mar 9, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.