Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3 Flash Preview
Gemini 3 Flash Preview comes out ahead, 73 to 68 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
xAIGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)
68/100- ECI152.0
- Price$1.25 / $2.50
- Context1M
- Our pick
GoogleGemini 3 Flash Preview
73/100- ECI151.8
- Price$0.50 / $3.00
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is our pick
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) (68). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 152.0 · Gemini 3 Flash Preview 151.8
- Lowest priceGemini 3 Flash PreviewGemini 3 Flash Preview $1.13 · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) $1.56 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini 3 Flash PreviewGemini 3 Flash Preview 1,048,576 · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 3 Flash PreviewGrok 4.20 (Reasoning): Text, Images, PDFs · Gemini 3 Flash Preview: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) | Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 81 | 80 |
| Price | 25% | 41 | 47 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 100 |
| Context window | 10% | 60 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 68/100 | 73/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)xAI | Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 152.0 (best) | 151.8 |
| ECI rank | #41 of 148 (best) | #43 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 89.3% | 89.4% (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 44.9% | 51.2% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 92.2% | 95.6% (best) |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 75.4% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 30.2% | 66.8% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.25 | $0.50 (best) |
| Output | $2.50 (best) | $3.00 |
| Cached input | $0.20 | $0.05 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.56 | $1.13 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Over 200K: $2.50 / $5.00 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official xAI API | Official Google API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 30,000 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yesminimal · low · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | grok-4.20-0309-reasoning | gemini-3-flash-preview |
| API providers | 11 | 20 (best) |
| Released | Mar 9, 2026 | Dec 17, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)$17.50
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview$11.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) or Gemini 3 Flash Preview?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) (68). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) or Gemini 3 Flash Preview?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview is cheaper at $0.50 input / $3.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) costs $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.13 per million tokens for Gemini 3 Flash Preview versus $1.56 for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 152.0 (#41 of 148) and Gemini 3 Flash Preview 151.8 (#43 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (149.3–154.4 vs 150.4–153.7), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Gemini 3 Flash Preview 89.4%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 89.3%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Gemini 3 Flash Preview 51.2%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 44.9%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Gemini 3 Flash Preview 95.6%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 92.2%; SimpleQA Verified — Gemini 3 Flash Preview 66.8%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 30.2%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3 Flash Preview has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning). Maximum output per response: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) up to 30,000, Gemini 3 Flash Preview up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) accepts text, images and PDFs; Gemini 3 Flash Preview accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Gemini 3 Flash Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) and Gemini 3 Flash Preview are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is the newest, released Mar 9, 2026. Gemini 3 Flash Preview came out Dec 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini 3 Flash Preview Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Kimi K2.6Three-way comparison
- Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI · ECI 151.1
- Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.2Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 151.8
- Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 miniOpenAI · ECI 148.8
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Kimi K2.5Moonshot AI · ECI 148.0
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs Qwen3.6 PlusAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 147.6
- Gemini 3 Flash Preview vs GLM-5.2Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 151.8
