Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs Inkling Small vs Kimi K2.6
Too close to call on our weighted score (Inkling Small 68, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 67, Kimi K2.6 64). The right pick depends on what you value most.
xAIGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)
67/100- ECI152.3
- Price$1.25 / $2.50
- Context1M
Thinking MachinesInkling Small
68/100- ECI150.5
- Price$0.58 / $1.44
- Context1.05M
Moonshot AIKimi K2.6
64/100- ECI151.1
- Price$0.95 / $4.00
- Context262K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Inkling Small 68/100, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 67/100, Kimi K2.6 64/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) for raw capability, Inkling Small on price and Inkling Small for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGrok 4.20 (Reasoning)Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 152.3 · Kimi K2.6 151.1 · Inkling Small 150.5
- Lowest priceInkling SmallInkling Small $0.795 · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) $1.56 · Kimi K2.6 $1.71 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextInkling SmallInkling Small 1,048,576 · Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 1,000,000 · Kimi K2.6 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGrok 4.20 (Reasoning): Text, Images, PDFs · Inkling Small: Text, Images, Audio · Kimi K2.6: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingInkling Small and Kimi K2.6Publishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) | Inkling Small | Kimi K2.6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 79 | 77 | 78 |
| Price | 25% | 39 | 52 | 37 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 70 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 60 | 61 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 67/100 | 68/100 | 64/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)xAI | Inkling SmallThinking Machines | Kimi K2.6Moonshot AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 152.3 (best) | 150.5 | 151.1 |
| ECI rank | #51 of 165 (best) | #58 of 165 | #55 of 165 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 89.3% | 88.5% | 90.8% (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 44.9% | 46.3% | 57.2% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 92.2% | 90.0% | 96.1% (best) |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | — | 76.7% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 30.2% | 19.1% | 34.9% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.25 | $0.58 (best) | $0.95 |
| Output | $2.50 | $1.44 (best) | $4.00 |
| Cached input | $0.20 | $0.116 (best) | $0.16 |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.56 | $0.795 (best) | $1.71 |
| Long-context rate | Over 200K: $2.50 / $5.00 | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official xAI API | Official Thinking Machines API | Official Moonshot AI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 30,000 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenApache-2.0 | Open |
| API model ID | grok-4.20-0309-reasoning | thinkingmachines/Inkling-Small | kimi-k2.6 |
| API providers | 15 | 12 | 60 (best) |
| Released | Mar 9, 2026 | Jul 30, 2026 | Apr 20, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Grok 4.20 (Reasoning)$17.50
- Inkling Small$8.68
- Kimi K2.6$17.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning), Inkling Small or Kimi K2.6?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Inkling Small 68/100, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 67/100, Kimi K2.6 64/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) for raw capability, Inkling Small on price and Inkling Small for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning), Inkling Small or Kimi K2.6?
Inkling Small is cheaper at $0.58 input / $1.44 output per million tokens (official Thinking Machines API price). Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) costs $1.25 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (official xAI API price); Kimi K2.6 costs $0.95 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (official Moonshot AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.795 per million tokens for Inkling Small versus $1.56 for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) (2× as much) and $1.71 for Kimi K2.6 (2.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 152.3 (#51 of 165), Kimi K2.6 151.1 (#55 of 165) and Inkling Small 150.5 (#58 of 165). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (149.5–154.7 vs 149.1–152.9), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Kimi K2.6 90.8%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 89.3%, Inkling Small 88.5%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Kimi K2.6 57.2%, Inkling Small 46.3%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 44.9%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Kimi K2.6 96.1%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 92.2%, Inkling Small 90.0%; SimpleQA Verified — Kimi K2.6 34.9%, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 30.2%, Inkling Small 19.1%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) and Inkling Small yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Inkling Small has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) and 262,144 for Kimi K2.6. Maximum output per response: Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) up to 30,000, Inkling Small up to 1,048,576, Kimi K2.6 up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) accepts text, images and PDFs; Inkling Small accepts text, images and audio; Kimi K2.6 accepts text, images and video. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Inkling Small and Kimi K2.6 publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Inkling Small is the newest, released Jul 30, 2026. Kimi K2.6 came out Apr 20, 2026; Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) came out Mar 9, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Kimi K2.6 Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs Gemini 3 Flash PreviewGoogle · ECI 152.0
- Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs GLM-5.2Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 152.1
- Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) vs GPT-5.4 miniOpenAI · ECI 148.8
- Inkling Small vs Qwen3.8 27BAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 151.8
- Inkling Small vs Mistral Large 4Mistral AI · ECI 150.6
- Inkling Small vs Kimi K2.7 CodeMoonshot AI · ECI 150.2
