GLM-4.5-Air vs solar-mini vs Codestral 25.08
Too close to call on our weighted score (solar-mini 50, GLM-4.5-Air 48, Codestral 25.08 47). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.5-Air
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $1.10
- Context131K
Upstagesolar-mini
50/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context33K
Mistral AICodestral 25.08
47/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $0.90
- Context128K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (solar-mini 50/100, GLM-4.5-Air 48/100, Codestral 25.08 47/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: solar-mini on price and GLM-4.5-Air for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest pricesolar-minisolar-mini $0.15 · GLM-4.5-Air $0.425 · Codestral 25.08 $0.45 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGLM-4.5-AirGLM-4.5-Air 131,072 · Codestral 25.08 128,000 · solar-mini 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsGLM-4.5-Air: Text · solar-mini: Text · Codestral 25.08: Text
- Self-hostingGLM-4.5-AirPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | GLM-4.5-Air | solar-mini | Codestral 25.08 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 65 | 85 | 64 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 25 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 25 | 0 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 48/100 | 50/100 | 47/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | GLM-4.5-AirZ.ai (Zhipu) | solar-miniUpstage | Codestral 25.08Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.20 | $0.15 (best) | $0.30 |
| Output | $1.10 | $0.15 (best) | $0.90 |
| Cached input | $0.03 | — | $0.03 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.425 | $0.15 (best) | $0.45 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Z.AI API | Official Upstage API | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 98,304 tokens (best) | 4,096 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | glm-4.5-air | solar-mini | codestral-2508 |
| API providers | 19 (best) | 1 | 11 |
| Released | Jul 28, 2025 | Jun 12, 2024 | Jul 30, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | Sep 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- GLM-4.5-Air$4.20
- solar-mini$1.80
- Codestral 25.08$4.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: GLM-4.5-Air, solar-mini or Codestral 25.08?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (solar-mini 50/100, GLM-4.5-Air 48/100, Codestral 25.08 47/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: solar-mini on price and GLM-4.5-Air for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.5-Air, solar-mini or Codestral 25.08?
solar-mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). GLM-4.5-Air costs $0.20 input / $1.10 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Codestral 25.08 costs $0.30 input / $0.90 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for solar-mini versus $0.425 for GLM-4.5-Air (2.8× as much) and $0.45 for Codestral 25.08 (3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. GLM-4.5-Air has not been scored yet, solar-mini has not been scored yet and Codestral 25.08 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for GLM-4.5-Air, solar-mini and Codestral 25.08 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GLM-4.5-Air has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Codestral 25.08 and 32,768 for solar-mini. Maximum output per response: GLM-4.5-Air up to 98,304, solar-mini up to 4,096, Codestral 25.08 up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
GLM-4.5-Air accepts text; solar-mini accepts text; Codestral 25.08 accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
GLM-4.5-Air publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; solar-mini and Codestral 25.08 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Codestral 25.08 is the newest, released Jul 30, 2025. GLM-4.5-Air came out Jul 28, 2025; solar-mini came out Jun 12, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: GLM-4.5-Air Apr 2025, solar-mini Sep 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
