solar-mini vs Command R
Too close to call on our weighted score (solar-mini 52, Command R 51). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Upstage
solar-mini
52/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context33K
CohereCommand R
51/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.60
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (solar-mini 52/100, Command R 51/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: solar-mini on price and Command R for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest pricesolar-minisolar-mini $0.15 · Command R $0.263 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextCommand RCommand R 128,000 · solar-mini 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputssolar-mini: Text · Command R: Text
- Self-hostingCommand RPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | solar-mini | Command R |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 89 | 77 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 0 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 52/100 | 51/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | solar-miniUpstage | Command RCohere |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.15 | $0.15 |
| Output | $0.15 (best) | $0.60 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15 (best) | $0.263 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Upstage API | Official Cohere API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens (best) | 4,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | solar-mini | command-r-08-2024 |
| API providers | 1 | 5 (best) |
| Released | Jun 12, 2024 | Aug 30, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Sep 2024 | Jun 1, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- solar-mini$1.80
- Command R$2.70
Which should you choose?
Which is better: solar-mini or Command R?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (solar-mini 52/100, Command R 51/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: solar-mini on price and Command R for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, solar-mini or Command R?
solar-mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). Command R costs $0.15 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for solar-mini versus $0.263 for Command R (1.8× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. solar-mini has not been scored yet and Command R has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for solar-mini and Command R yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Command R has the largest context window at 128,000 tokens, against 32,768 for solar-mini. Maximum output per response: solar-mini up to 4,096, Command R up to 4,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
solar-mini accepts text; Command R accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Command R publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; solar-mini is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Command R is the newest, released Aug 30, 2024. solar-mini came out Jun 12, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: solar-mini Sep 2024, Command R Jun 1, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
