Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs Qwen MT Plus vs DeepSeek V4 Pro
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview comes out ahead, 46 to 39 and 11 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
GoogleGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview
46/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $5.00
- Context131K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen MT Plus
11/100- ECI—
- Price$2.46 / $7.37
- Context16K
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Pro
39/100- ECI—
- Price$1.60 / $3.30
- Context1M
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is our pick
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 46/100 against DeepSeek V4 Pro (39) and Qwen MT Plus (11). It leads on inputs & features. DeepSeek V4 Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview $2.00 · DeepSeek V4 Pro $2.03 · Qwen MT Plus $3.69 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextDeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek V4 Pro 1,000,000 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 131,072 · Qwen MT Plus 16,384 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Qwen MT Plus: Text · DeepSeek V4 Pro: Text
- Self-hostingDeepSeek V4 ProPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview | Qwen MT Plus | DeepSeek V4 Pro |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 34 | 22 | 34 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 0 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 25 | 0 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 46/100 | 11/100 | 39/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogle | Qwen MT PlusAlibaba (Qwen) | DeepSeek V4 ProDeepSeek |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.00 (best) | $2.46 | $1.60 |
| Output | $5.00 | $7.37 | $3.30 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.00 (best) | $3.69 | $2.03 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Official Alibaba API | Median of 56 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 16,384 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens | 8,192 tokens | 384,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | qwen-mt-plus | — |
| API providers | 1 | 3 | 58 (best) |
| Released | Apr 14, 2026 | Jul 24, 2025 | Apr 24, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | — | May 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview$20.00
- Qwen MT Plus$39.34
- DeepSeek V4 Pro$22.60
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview, Qwen MT Plus or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 46/100 against DeepSeek V4 Pro (39) and Qwen MT Plus (11). It leads on inputs & features. DeepSeek V4 Pro wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview, Qwen MT Plus or DeepSeek V4 Pro?
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is cheaper at $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). DeepSeek V4 Pro costs $1.60 input / $3.30 output per million tokens (median across 56 API providers); Qwen MT Plus costs $2.46 input / $7.37 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.00 per million tokens for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview versus $2.03 for DeepSeek V4 Pro (1× as much) and $3.69 for Qwen MT Plus (1.8× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview has not been scored yet, Qwen MT Plus has not been scored yet and DeepSeek V4 Pro has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview, Qwen MT Plus and DeepSeek V4 Pro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen MT Plus does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
DeepSeek V4 Pro has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and 16,384 for Qwen MT Plus. Maximum output per response: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview up to 65,536, Qwen MT Plus up to 8,192, DeepSeek V4 Pro up to 384,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview accepts text, images, audio and video; Qwen MT Plus accepts text; DeepSeek V4 Pro accepts text. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
DeepSeek V4 Pro publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and Qwen MT Plus is proprietary.
Which is newer?
DeepSeek V4 Pro is the newest, released Apr 24, 2026. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview came out Apr 14, 2026; Qwen MT Plus came out Jul 24, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview Jan 2025, DeepSeek V4 Pro May 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
