ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Codestral 25.08 vs GLM-4.5-Air vs Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B comes out ahead, 51 to 48 and 47 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Mistral AI

    Codestral 25.08

    Released Jul 30, 2025

    47/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.30 / $0.90
    • Context128K
  2. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-4.5-Air

    Released Jul 28, 2025

    48/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $1.10
    • Context131K
  3. Our pick

    Nous Research

    Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B

    Released Apr 30, 2024

    51/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.14 / $0.14
    • Context8K
01 — Verdict

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B is our pick

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against GLM-4.5-Air (48) and Codestral 25.08 (47). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceHermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8BHermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B $0.14 · GLM-4.5-Air $0.425 · Codestral 25.08 $0.45 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGLM-4.5-AirGLM-4.5-Air 131,072 · Codestral 25.08 128,000 · Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B 8,192 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsCodestral 25.08: Text · GLM-4.5-Air: Text · Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B: Text
  • Self-hostingGLM-4.5-Air and Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8BPublishes downloadable weights (Llama 3 Community License)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightCodestral 25.08GLM-4.5-AirHermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B
Price50%646587
Inputs & features30%353525
Context window20%24250
Overall100%47/10048/10051/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Codestral 25.08 vs GLM-4.5-Air vs Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B specifications side by side
SpecificationCodestral 25.08Mistral AIGLM-4.5-AirZ.ai (Zhipu)Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8BNous Research
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.30$0.20$0.14 (best)
Output$0.90$1.10$0.14 (best)
Cached input$0.03$0.03—
Blended (3:1)$0.45$0.425$0.14 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIOfficial Z.AI APIMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Max output8,192 tokens98,304 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpenLlama 3 Community License
API model IDcodestral-2508glm-4.5-air—
API providers1119 (best)2
ReleasedJul 30, 2025Jul 28, 2025Apr 30, 2024
Knowledge cutoff—Apr 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Codestral 25.08$4.80
  • GLM-4.5-Air$4.20
  • Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B$1.68
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Codestral 25.08, GLM-4.5-Air or Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B?

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against GLM-4.5-Air (48) and Codestral 25.08 (47). It leads on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Codestral 25.08, GLM-4.5-Air or Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B?

Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B is cheaper at $0.14 input / $0.14 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). GLM-4.5-Air costs $0.20 input / $1.10 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Codestral 25.08 costs $0.30 input / $0.90 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.14 per million tokens for Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B versus $0.425 for GLM-4.5-Air (3× as much) and $0.45 for Codestral 25.08 (3.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Codestral 25.08 has not been scored yet, GLM-4.5-Air has not been scored yet and Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Codestral 25.08, GLM-4.5-Air and Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-4.5-Air has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Codestral 25.08 and 8,192 for Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B. Maximum output per response: Codestral 25.08 up to 8,192, GLM-4.5-Air up to 98,304, Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Codestral 25.08 accepts text; GLM-4.5-Air accepts text; Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

GLM-4.5-Air and Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B publishes its weights (Llama 3 Community License) and can be self-hosted; Codestral 25.08 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Codestral 25.08 is the newest, released Jul 30, 2025. GLM-4.5-Air came out Jul 28, 2025; Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8B came out Apr 30, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: GLM-4.5-Air Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.