Codestral 25.08 vs Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking comes out ahead, 59 to 47 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Mistral AICodestral 25.08
47/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $0.90
- Context128K
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking
59/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.97
- Context66K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking is our pick
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against Codestral 25.08 (47). It leads on inputs & features. Codestral 25.08 wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3 Omni 30B A3B ThinkingQwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking $0.43 · Codestral 25.08 $0.45 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextCodestral 25.08Codestral 25.08 128,000 · Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking 65,536 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3 Omni 30B A3B ThinkingCodestral 25.08: Text · Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking: Text, Images, Audio, Video
- Self-hostingQwen3 Omni 30B A3B ThinkingPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Codestral 25.08 | Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 64 | 64 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 12 |
| Overall | 100% | 47/100 | 59/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Codestral 25.08Mistral AI | Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B ThinkingAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.30 | $0.25 (best) |
| Output | $0.90 (best) | $0.97 |
| Cached input | $0.03 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.45 | $0.43 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Mistral API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens (best) | 65,536 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 16,384 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenApache-2.0 |
| API model ID | codestral-2508 | — |
| API providers | 11 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Jul 30, 2025 | Sep 22, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Codestral 25.08$4.80
- Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking$4.44
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Codestral 25.08 or Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking?
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against Codestral 25.08 (47). It leads on inputs & features. Codestral 25.08 wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Codestral 25.08 or Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking?
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking is cheaper at $0.25 input / $0.97 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Codestral 25.08 costs $0.30 input / $0.90 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.43 per million tokens for Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking versus $0.45 for Codestral 25.08 (1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Codestral 25.08 has not been scored yet and Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Codestral 25.08 and Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Codestral 25.08 has the largest context window at 128,000 tokens, against 65,536 for Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking. Maximum output per response: Codestral 25.08 up to 8,192, Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Codestral 25.08 accepts text; Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking accepts text, images, audio and video. Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Codestral 25.08 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking is the newest, released Sep 22, 2025. Codestral 25.08 came out Jul 30, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GLM-4.5-AirThree-way comparison
- Codestral 25.08 vs GLM-4.5-AirZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Codestral 25.08 vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.5NVIDIA
- Codestral 25.08 vs ERNIE 4.5 300B A47BBaidu
- Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITAI Singapore
- Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking vs GLM-4.5-AirZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Qwen3 Omni 30B A3B Thinking vs Grok Code Fast 1xAI
