ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Baichuan M2 32B vs DeepSeek-R1 vs DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B

Too close to call on our weighted score (Baichuan M2 32B 58, DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B 58, DeepSeek-R1 34). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Baichuan

    Baichuan M2 32B

    Released Aug 13, 2025

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.07 / $0.07
    • Context131K
  2. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek-R1

    Released Jan 20, 2025

    34/100
    • ECI138.8
    • Price$0.70 / $4.88
    • Context128K
  3. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B

    Released May 29, 2025

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.06 / $0.09
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Baichuan M2 32B 58/100, DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B 58/100, DeepSeek-R1 34/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceDeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8BDeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B $0.068 · Baichuan M2 32B $0.07 · DeepSeek-R1 $1.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextBaichuan M2 32B and DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8BBaichuan M2 32B 131,072 · DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B 131,072 · DeepSeek-R1 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsBaichuan M2 32B: Text · DeepSeek-R1: Text · DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightBaichuan M2 32BDeepSeek-R1DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B
Price50%10037100
Inputs & features30%103510
Context window20%252425
Overall100%58/10034/10058/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Baichuan M2 32B vs DeepSeek-R1 vs DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B specifications side by side
SpecificationBaichuan M2 32BBaichuanDeepSeek-R1DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8BDeepSeek
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—138.8—
ECI rank—#119 of 165—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—71.7% (best)9.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—53.3% (best)43.9%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.07$0.70$0.06 (best)
Output$0.07 (best)$4.88$0.09
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.07$1.75$0.068 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersMedian of 11 providersMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens (best)32,768 tokens32,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesYesYes
Tool callingNoYesNo
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenApache-2.0OpenOpenMIT
API model ID———
API providers112 (best)1
ReleasedAug 13, 2025Jan 20, 2025May 29, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Jul 2024—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Baichuan M2 32B$0.84
  • DeepSeek-R1$16.76
  • DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B$0.78
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Baichuan M2 32B, DeepSeek-R1 or DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Baichuan M2 32B 58/100, DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B 58/100, DeepSeek-R1 34/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Baichuan M2 32B, DeepSeek-R1 or DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B?

DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B is cheaper at $0.06 input / $0.09 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Baichuan M2 32B costs $0.07 input / $0.07 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); DeepSeek-R1 costs $0.70 input / $4.88 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.068 per million tokens for DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B versus $0.07 for Baichuan M2 32B (1× as much) and $1.75 for DeepSeek-R1 (26× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Baichuan M2 32B has not been scored yet, DeepSeek-R1 has an ECI of 138.8 and DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Baichuan M2 32B, DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Baichuan M2 32B and DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Baichuan M2 32B and DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 128,000 for DeepSeek-R1. Maximum output per response: Baichuan M2 32B up to 131,072, DeepSeek-R1 up to 32,768, DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B up to 32,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Baichuan M2 32B accepts text; DeepSeek-R1 accepts text; DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache-2.0 and MIT), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Baichuan M2 32B is the newest, released Aug 13, 2025. DeepSeek R1 0528 Qwen3 8B came out May 29, 2025; DeepSeek-R1 came out Jan 20, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: DeepSeek-R1 Jul 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.