ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Baichuan M2 32B vs AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual

Too close to call on our weighted score (AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual 60, Baichuan M2 32B 58). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Baichuan

    Baichuan M2 32B

    Released Aug 13, 2025

    58/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.07 / $0.07
    • Context131K
    Full specs Remove Baichuan M2 32B

  2. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual

    Released Dec 10, 2025

    60/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.035 / $0.138
    • Context66K
    Full specs Remove AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual 60/100, Baichuan M2 32B 58/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual on price and Baichuan M2 32B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceAutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualAutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual $0.061 · Baichuan M2 32B $0.07 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextBaichuan M2 32BBaichuan M2 32B 131,072 · AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual 65,536 tokens
  • Widest inputsAutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualBaichuan M2 32B: Text · AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightBaichuan M2 32BAutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual
Price50%100100
Inputs & features30%1025
Context window20%2512
Overall100%58/10060/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Baichuan M2 32B vs AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual specifications side by side
SpecificationBaichuan M2 32BBaichuanAutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualZ.ai (Zhipu)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.07$0.035 (best)
Output$0.07 (best)$0.138
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.07$0.061 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)65,536 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens (best)65,536 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingNoNo
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenApache-2.0OpenMIT
API model ID——
API providers12 (best)
ReleasedAug 13, 2025Dec 10, 2025
Knowledge cutoff——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Baichuan M2 32B$0.84
  • AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual$0.626
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Baichuan M2 32B or AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual 60/100, Baichuan M2 32B 58/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual on price and Baichuan M2 32B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Baichuan M2 32B or AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual?

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual is cheaper at $0.035 input / $0.138 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Baichuan M2 32B costs $0.07 input / $0.07 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.061 per million tokens for AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual versus $0.07 for Baichuan M2 32B (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Baichuan M2 32B has not been scored yet and AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Baichuan M2 32B and AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Baichuan M2 32B and AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Baichuan M2 32B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 65,536 for AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual. Maximum output per response: Baichuan M2 32B up to 131,072, AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Baichuan M2 32B accepts text; AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual accepts text and images. AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, both publish their weights (Apache-2.0 and MIT), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual is the newest, released Dec 10, 2025. Baichuan M2 32B came out Aug 13, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons