ZMIME
Video model comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Wan 2.2 A14B vs Veo 3.0 Fast

Preferred for text to video: Veo 3.0 Fast · Preferred for image to video: Veo 3.0 Fast · Newest: Veo 3.0 Fast. Quality scores are blind human-preference votes; specs and prices come from each lab’s listings.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Wan 2.2 A14B

    Released Jul 28, 2025

    • Text to video
    • Arena1,170
    • From—
    • Max length—
    Full specs Remove Wan 2.2 A14B

  2. Google

    Veo 3.0 Fast

    Released Jul 31, 2025

    • Text to video
    • Image to video
    • Arena1,348
    • From—
    • Max length—
    Full specs Remove Veo 3.0 Fast

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — At a glance

Where they differ

Quality is the arena score from blind, side-by-side human votes. Price, length and resolution come from each lab’s own listings.

  • Preferred for text to videoVeo 3.0 FastWan 2.2 A14B 1,132 (#42) · Veo 3.0 Fast 1,348 (#16) — blind human votes
  • Preferred for image to videoVeo 3.0 FastWan 2.2 A14B 1,170 (#43) · Veo 3.0 Fast 1,326 (#21) — blind human votes
  • NewestVeo 3.0 FastWan 2.2 A14B Jul 28, 2025 · Veo 3.0 Fast Jul 31, 2025
  • Widest inputsVeo 3.0 FastWan 2.2 A14B: Text prompts · Veo 3.0 Fast: Text prompts, Reference images
  • Native audioNo native audioGenerates an audio track with the video: Wan 2.2 A14B no · Veo 3.0 Fast no
  • Image to videoVeo 3.0 FastStarts from an uploaded image: Wan 2.2 A14B no · Veo 3.0 Fast yes
  • Self-hostingWan 2.2 A14BDownloadable weights
  • Most API hostsVeo 3.0 FastWan 2.2 A14B: 1 · Veo 3.0 Fast: 2
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Dashes mean the data is not published.

Wan 2.2 A14B vs Veo 3.0 Fast specifications side by side
SpecificationWan 2.2 A14BAlibaba (Qwen)Veo 3.0 FastGoogle
Quality (blind human votes)
Text to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better1,132 ±15#42 of 48 · 10,458 votes1,348 ±11#16 of 48 · 25,258 votes (best)
Image to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better1,170 ±10#43 of 48 · 27,054 votes1,326 ±10#21 of 48 · 41,194 votes (best)
Output
ProducesVideoVideo
Inputs
Text promptsYesYes
Start image (image to video)NoYes
Video inputNoNo
Audio inputNoNo
Access
WeightsOpenProprietary
API hosts12 (best)
ReleasedJul 28, 2025Jul 31, 2025
03 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better, Wan 2.2 A14B or Veo 3.0 Fast?

For text to video, voters prefer Veo 3.0 Fast (Wan 2.2 A14B 1,132 (#42) · Veo 3.0 Fast 1,348 (#16)). For image to video, voters prefer Veo 3.0 Fast (Wan 2.2 A14B 1,170 (#43) · Veo 3.0 Fast 1,326 (#21)). Arena scores come from blind, side-by-side human votes on the same prompts; when the gap is inside both models’ error margins we call it a tie. Test your own prompts before you commit.

What is the difference between Wan 2.2 A14B and Veo 3.0 Fast?

Wan 2.2 A14B is a video model from Alibaba (Qwen) (Jul 28, 2025), taking text prompts and producing video. Veo 3.0 Fast is a video model from Google (Jul 31, 2025), taking text prompts and reference images and producing video.

Which is newer?

Wan 2.2 A14B Jul 28, 2025; Veo 3.0 Fast Jul 31, 2025.

Which generates video with sound?

Generates an audio track with the video: Wan 2.2 A14B no; Veo 3.0 Fast no.

Can I run any of these on my own hardware?

Wan 2.2 A14B. Downloadable weights.

04 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons