ZMIME
Video model comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Wan 2.2 A14B vs Kling v2.5 Turbo

Preferred for text to video: Kling v2.5 Turbo · Preferred for image to video: Kling v2.5 Turbo · Newest: Kling v2.5 Turbo. Quality scores are blind human-preference votes; specs and prices come from each lab’s listings.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Wan 2.2 A14B

    Released Jul 28, 2025

    • Text to video
    • Arena1,170
    • From—
    • Max length—
    Full specs Remove Wan 2.2 A14B

  2. Kling AI

    Kling v2.5 Turbo

    Released Sep 23, 2025

    • Text to video
    • Image to video
    • Arena1,276
    • From—
    • Max length—
    Full specs Remove Kling v2.5 Turbo

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — At a glance

Where they differ

Quality is the arena score from blind, side-by-side human votes. Price, length and resolution come from each lab’s own listings.

  • Preferred for text to videoKling v2.5 TurboWan 2.2 A14B 1,132 (#42) · Kling v2.5 Turbo 1,220 (#28) — blind human votes
  • Preferred for image to videoKling v2.5 TurboWan 2.2 A14B 1,170 (#43) · Kling v2.5 Turbo 1,276 (#27) — blind human votes
  • NewestKling v2.5 TurboWan 2.2 A14B Jul 28, 2025 · Kling v2.5 Turbo Sep 23, 2025
  • Widest inputsKling v2.5 TurboWan 2.2 A14B: Text prompts · Kling v2.5 Turbo: Text prompts, Reference images
  • Native audioNo native audioGenerates an audio track with the video: Wan 2.2 A14B no · Kling v2.5 Turbo no
  • Image to videoKling v2.5 TurboStarts from an uploaded image: Wan 2.2 A14B no · Kling v2.5 Turbo yes
  • Self-hostingWan 2.2 A14BDownloadable weights
  • Most API hostsSame reachWan 2.2 A14B: 1 · Kling v2.5 Turbo: 1
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Dashes mean the data is not published.

Wan 2.2 A14B vs Kling v2.5 Turbo specifications side by side
SpecificationWan 2.2 A14BAlibaba (Qwen)Kling v2.5 TurboKling AI
Quality (blind human votes)
Text to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better1,132 ±15#42 of 48 · 10,458 votes1,220 ±17#28 of 48 · 2,111 votes (best)
Image to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better1,170 ±10#43 of 48 · 27,054 votes1,276 ±13#27 of 48 · 3,795 votes (best)
Output
ProducesVideoVideo
Inputs
Text promptsYesYes
Start image (image to video)NoYes
Video inputNoNo
Audio inputNoNo
Access
WeightsOpenProprietary
API hosts11
ReleasedJul 28, 2025Sep 23, 2025
03 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better, Wan 2.2 A14B or Kling v2.5 Turbo?

For text to video, voters prefer Kling v2.5 Turbo (Wan 2.2 A14B 1,132 (#42) · Kling v2.5 Turbo 1,220 (#28)). For image to video, voters prefer Kling v2.5 Turbo (Wan 2.2 A14B 1,170 (#43) · Kling v2.5 Turbo 1,276 (#27)). Arena scores come from blind, side-by-side human votes on the same prompts; when the gap is inside both models’ error margins we call it a tie. Test your own prompts before you commit.

What is the difference between Wan 2.2 A14B and Kling v2.5 Turbo?

Wan 2.2 A14B is a video model from Alibaba (Qwen) (Jul 28, 2025), taking text prompts and producing video. Kling v2.5 Turbo is a video model from Kling AI (Sep 23, 2025), taking text prompts and reference images and producing video.

Which is newer?

Wan 2.2 A14B Jul 28, 2025; Kling v2.5 Turbo Sep 23, 2025.

Which generates video with sound?

Generates an audio track with the video: Wan 2.2 A14B no; Kling v2.5 Turbo no.

Can I run any of these on my own hardware?

Wan 2.2 A14B. Downloadable weights.

04 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons