ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 vs Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) vs Granite-4.0-H-Micro

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) comes out ahead, 72 to 62 and 61 on our weighted score, though Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 is 43% cheaper per token.

  1. Mistral AI

    Voxtral Mini 3B 2507

    Released Jul 15, 2025

    61/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.04 / $0.04
    • Context33K
  2. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)

    Released Oct 15, 2025

    72/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.022 / $0.215
    • Context262K
  3. IBM

    Granite-4.0-H-Micro

    Released Oct 2, 2025

    62/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.018 / $0.115
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) is our pick

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Granite-4.0-H-Micro (62) and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 (61). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceVoxtral Mini 3B 2507Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 $0.04 · Granite-4.0-H-Micro $0.042 · Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) $0.07 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) 262,144 · Granite-4.0-H-Micro 131,072 · Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsVoxtral Mini 3B 2507 and Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)Voxtral Mini 3B 2507: Text, Audio · Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud): Text, Images · Granite-4.0-H-Micro: Text
  • Self-hostingVoxtral Mini 3B 2507 and Granite-4.0-H-MicroPublishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightVoxtral Mini 3B 2507Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)Granite-4.0-H-Micro
Price50%100100100
Inputs & features30%355025
Context window20%03725
Overall100%61/10072/10062/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 vs Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) vs Granite-4.0-H-Micro specifications side by side
SpecificationVoxtral Mini 3B 2507Mistral AIQwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)Alibaba (Qwen)Granite-4.0-H-MicroIBM
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.04$0.022$0.018 (best)
Output$0.04 (best)$0.215$0.115
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.04 (best)$0.07$0.042
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersMedian of 1 providersMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window32,768 tokens262,144 tokens (best)131,072 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens32,768 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioYesNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenApache 2.0ProprietaryOpen
API model ID———
API providers3 (best)12
ReleasedJul 15, 2025Oct 15, 2025Oct 2, 2025
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Voxtral Mini 3B 2507$0.48
  • Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)$0.65
  • Granite-4.0-H-Micro$0.405
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Voxtral Mini 3B 2507, Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) or Granite-4.0-H-Micro?

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against Granite-4.0-H-Micro (62) and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 (61). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Voxtral Mini 3B 2507, Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) or Granite-4.0-H-Micro?

Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 is cheaper at $0.04 input / $0.04 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Granite-4.0-H-Micro costs $0.018 input / $0.115 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) costs $0.022 input / $0.215 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.04 per million tokens for Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 versus $0.042 for Granite-4.0-H-Micro (1× as much) and $0.07 for Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) (1.8× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 has not been scored yet, Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) has not been scored yet and Granite-4.0-H-Micro has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Voxtral Mini 3B 2507, Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) and Granite-4.0-H-Micro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for Granite-4.0-H-Micro and 32,768 for Voxtral Mini 3B 2507. Maximum output per response: Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 up to 32,768, Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) up to 32,768, Granite-4.0-H-Micro up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 accepts text and audio; Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) accepts text and images; Granite-4.0-H-Micro accepts text. Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 and Granite-4.0-H-Micro publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) is the newest, released Oct 15, 2025. Granite-4.0-H-Micro came out Oct 2, 2025; Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 came out Jul 15, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.