ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) vs AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) comes out ahead, 72 to 60 on our weighted score, though AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual is 14% cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)

    Released Oct 15, 2025

    72/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.022 / $0.215
    • Context262K
  2. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual

    Released Dec 10, 2025

    60/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.035 / $0.138
    • Context66K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) is our pick

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual (60). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceAutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualAutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual $0.061 · Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) $0.07 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) 262,144 · AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual 65,536 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsQwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud): Text, Images · AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualPublishes downloadable weights (MIT)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual
Price50%100100
Inputs & features30%5025
Context window20%3712
Overall100%72/10060/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) vs AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)Alibaba (Qwen)AutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualZ.ai (Zhipu)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.022 (best)$0.035
Output$0.215$0.138 (best)
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.07$0.061 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens (best)65,536 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesNo
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenMIT
API model ID——
API providers12 (best)
ReleasedOct 15, 2025Dec 10, 2025
Knowledge cutoff——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)$0.65
  • AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual$0.626
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) or AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual?

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) is the better all-round choice, scoring 72/100 against AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual (60). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) or AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual?

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual is cheaper at $0.035 input / $0.138 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) costs $0.022 input / $0.215 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.061 per million tokens for AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual versus $0.07 for Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) has not been scored yet and AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) and AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 65,536 for AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) up to 32,768, AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) accepts text and images; AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual publishes its weights (MIT) and can be self-hosted; Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) is proprietary.

Which is newer?

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual is the newest, released Dec 10, 2025. Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) came out Oct 15, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.