Vision Small vs Nova Pro vs Qwen Max
Vision Small comes out ahead, 61 to 49 and 24 on our weighted score, though Nova Pro is 11% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
VisparkVision Small
61/100- ECI—
- Price$1.05 / $3.16
- Context1M
AmazonNova Pro
49/100- ECI—
- Price$0.80 / $3.20
- Context300K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen Max
24/100- ECI—
- Price$1.60 / $6.40
- Context33K
Vision Small is our pick
Vision Small is the better all-round choice, scoring 61/100 against Nova Pro (49) and Qwen Max (24). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Nova Pro wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNova ProNova Pro $1.40 · Vision Small $1.58 · Qwen Max $2.80 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextVision SmallVision Small 1,000,000 · Nova Pro 300,000 · Qwen Max 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsVision SmallVision Small: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Nova Pro: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Qwen Max: Text
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Vision Small | Nova Pro | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 39 | 41 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 100 | 70 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 39 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 61/100 | 49/100 | 24/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Vision SmallVispark | Nova ProAmazon | Qwen MaxAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.05 | $0.80 (best) | $1.60 |
| Output | $3.16 (best) | $3.20 | $6.40 |
| Cached input | — | $0.20 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.58 | $1.40 (best) | $2.80 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Vispark API | Official Amazon Bedrock API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 300,000 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 10,000 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes | No |
| Audio | Yes | No | No |
| Video | Yes | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | vispark/vision-small | amazon.nova-pro-v1:0 | qwen-max |
| API providers | 1 | 9 (best) | 8 |
| Released | May 15, 2024 | Dec 3, 2024 | Apr 3, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Oct 2024 | Apr 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Vision Small$16.82
- Nova Pro$14.40
- Qwen Max$28.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Vision Small, Nova Pro or Qwen Max?
Vision Small is the better all-round choice, scoring 61/100 against Nova Pro (49) and Qwen Max (24). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Nova Pro wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Vision Small, Nova Pro or Qwen Max?
Nova Pro is cheaper at $0.80 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). Vision Small costs $1.05 input / $3.16 output per million tokens (official Vispark API price); Qwen Max costs $1.60 input / $6.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.40 per million tokens for Nova Pro versus $1.58 for Vision Small (1.1× as much) and $2.80 for Qwen Max (2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Vision Small has not been scored yet, Nova Pro has not been scored yet and Qwen Max has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Vision Small, Nova Pro and Qwen Max yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Vision Small has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 300,000 for Nova Pro and 32,768 for Qwen Max. Maximum output per response: Vision Small up to 65,536, Nova Pro up to 10,000, Qwen Max up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Vision Small accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Nova Pro accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Qwen Max accepts text. Vision Small handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Vision Small, Nova Pro and Qwen Max are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Nova Pro is the newest, released Dec 3, 2024. Vision Small came out May 15, 2024; Qwen Max came out Apr 3, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Nova Pro Oct 2024, Qwen Max Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
