Nova Pro vs Aya Expanse 32B
Nova Pro comes out ahead, 49 to 32 on our weighted score, though Aya Expanse 32B is 46% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
AmazonNova Pro
49/100- ECI—
- Price$0.80 / $3.20
- Context300K
CohereAya Expanse 32B
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context128K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Nova Pro is our pick
Nova Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against Aya Expanse 32B (32). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Aya Expanse 32B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceAya Expanse 32BAya Expanse 32B $0.75 · Nova Pro $1.40 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNova ProNova Pro 300,000 · Aya Expanse 32B 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsNova ProNova Pro: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Aya Expanse 32B: Text
- Self-hostingAya Expanse 32BPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
| Measure | Weight | Nova Pro | Aya Expanse 32B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 41 | 53 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 0 |
| Context window | 20% | 39 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 49/100 | 32/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Nova ProAmazon | Aya Expanse 32BCohere |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.80 | $0.50 (best) |
| Output | $3.20 | $1.50 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.20 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.40 | $0.75 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Amazon Bedrock API | Official Cohere API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 300,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 10,000 tokens (best) | 4,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 |
| API model ID | amazon.nova-pro-v1:0 | c4ai-aya-expanse-32b |
| API providers | 9 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Dec 3, 2024 | Oct 24, 2024 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Oct 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Nova Pro$14.40
- Aya Expanse 32B$8.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Nova Pro or Aya Expanse 32B?
Nova Pro is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against Aya Expanse 32B (32). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Aya Expanse 32B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Nova Pro or Aya Expanse 32B?
Aya Expanse 32B is cheaper at $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). Nova Pro costs $0.80 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.75 per million tokens for Aya Expanse 32B versus $1.40 for Nova Pro (1.9× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Nova Pro has not been scored yet and Aya Expanse 32B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Nova Pro and Aya Expanse 32B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Expanse 32B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova Pro has the largest context window at 300,000 tokens, against 128,000 for Aya Expanse 32B. Maximum output per response: Nova Pro up to 10,000, Aya Expanse 32B up to 4,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Nova Pro accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Aya Expanse 32B accepts text. Nova Pro handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Aya Expanse 32B publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; Nova Pro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Nova Pro is the newest, released Dec 3, 2024. Aya Expanse 32B came out Oct 24, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Nova Pro Oct 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Aion-RP 1.0 (8B)Three-way comparison
- Nova Pro vs Aion-RP 1.0 (8B)Aion Labs
- Nova Pro vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
- Nova Pro vs Hermes 3 405B InstructNous Research
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Hermes 3 70B InstructNous Research
- Aya Expanse 32B vs Aion-RP 1.0 (8B)Aion Labs
