ZMIME
Video model comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Veo 3.0 Fast vs Wan 2.2 A14B

Preferred for text to video: Veo 3.0 Fast · Preferred for image to video: Veo 3.0 Fast · Newest: Veo 3.0 Fast. Quality scores are blind human-preference votes; specs and prices come from each lab’s listings.

  1. Google

    Veo 3.0 Fast

    Released Jul 31, 2025

    • Text to video
    • Image to video
    • Arena1,348
    • From—
    • Max length—
    Full specs Remove Veo 3.0 Fast

  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Wan 2.2 A14B

    Released Jul 28, 2025

    • Text to video
    • Arena1,170
    • From—
    • Max length—
    Full specs Remove Wan 2.2 A14B

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — At a glance

Where they differ

Quality is the arena score from blind, side-by-side human votes. Price, length and resolution come from each lab’s own listings.

  • Preferred for text to videoVeo 3.0 FastVeo 3.0 Fast 1,348 (#16) · Wan 2.2 A14B 1,132 (#42) — blind human votes
  • Preferred for image to videoVeo 3.0 FastVeo 3.0 Fast 1,326 (#21) · Wan 2.2 A14B 1,170 (#43) — blind human votes
  • NewestVeo 3.0 FastVeo 3.0 Fast Jul 31, 2025 · Wan 2.2 A14B Jul 28, 2025
  • Widest inputsVeo 3.0 FastVeo 3.0 Fast: Text prompts, Reference images · Wan 2.2 A14B: Text prompts
  • Native audioNo native audioGenerates an audio track with the video: Veo 3.0 Fast no · Wan 2.2 A14B no
  • Image to videoVeo 3.0 FastStarts from an uploaded image: Veo 3.0 Fast yes · Wan 2.2 A14B no
  • Self-hostingWan 2.2 A14BDownloadable weights
  • Most API hostsVeo 3.0 FastVeo 3.0 Fast: 2 · Wan 2.2 A14B: 1
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Dashes mean the data is not published.

Veo 3.0 Fast vs Wan 2.2 A14B specifications side by side
SpecificationVeo 3.0 FastGoogleWan 2.2 A14BAlibaba (Qwen)
Quality (blind human votes)
Text to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better1,348 ±11#16 of 48 · 25,258 votes (best)1,132 ±15#42 of 48 · 10,458 votes
Image to video arenaElo-style score · higher is better1,326 ±10#21 of 48 · 41,194 votes (best)1,170 ±10#43 of 48 · 27,054 votes
Output
ProducesVideoVideo
Inputs
Text promptsYesYes
Start image (image to video)YesNo
Video inputNoNo
Audio inputNoNo
Access
WeightsProprietaryOpen
API hosts2 (best)1
ReleasedJul 31, 2025Jul 28, 2025
03 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better, Veo 3.0 Fast or Wan 2.2 A14B?

For text to video, voters prefer Veo 3.0 Fast (Veo 3.0 Fast 1,348 (#16) · Wan 2.2 A14B 1,132 (#42)). For image to video, voters prefer Veo 3.0 Fast (Veo 3.0 Fast 1,326 (#21) · Wan 2.2 A14B 1,170 (#43)). Arena scores come from blind, side-by-side human votes on the same prompts; when the gap is inside both models’ error margins we call it a tie. Test your own prompts before you commit.

What is the difference between Veo 3.0 Fast and Wan 2.2 A14B?

Veo 3.0 Fast is a video model from Google (Jul 31, 2025), taking text prompts and reference images and producing video. Wan 2.2 A14B is a video model from Alibaba (Qwen) (Jul 28, 2025), taking text prompts and producing video.

Which is newer?

Veo 3.0 Fast Jul 31, 2025; Wan 2.2 A14B Jul 28, 2025.

Which generates video with sound?

Generates an audio track with the video: Veo 3.0 Fast no; Wan 2.2 A14B no.

Can I run any of these on my own hardware?

Wan 2.2 A14B. Downloadable weights.

04 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons