Solar Pro 2 vs MiniMax M1 80K
Solar Pro 2 comes out ahead, 51 to 47 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
UpstageSolar Pro 2
51/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.25
- Context66K
MiniMaxMiniMax M1 80K
47/100- ECI—
- Price$0.55 / $2.20
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Solar Pro 2 is our pick
Solar Pro 2 is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against MiniMax M1 80K (47). It leads on price. MiniMax M1 80K wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSolar Pro 2Solar Pro 2 $0.25 · MiniMax M1 80K $0.963 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMiniMax M1 80KMiniMax M1 80K 1,000,000 · Solar Pro 2 65,536 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsSolar Pro 2: Text · MiniMax M1 80K: Text
- Self-hostingMiniMax M1 80KPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Solar Pro 2 | MiniMax M1 80K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 75 | 48 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 12 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 51/100 | 47/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Solar Pro 2Upstage | MiniMax M1 80KMiniMax |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.25 (best) | $0.55 |
| Output | $0.25 (best) | $2.20 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.25 (best) | $0.963 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Upstage API | Median of 5 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 65,536 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 80,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · high | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenApache-2.0 |
| API model ID | solar-pro2 | — |
| API providers | 2 | 5 (best) |
| Released | May 20, 2025 | Jun 17, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Mar 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Solar Pro 2$3.00
- MiniMax M1 80K$9.90
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Solar Pro 2 or MiniMax M1 80K?
Solar Pro 2 is the better all-round choice, scoring 51/100 against MiniMax M1 80K (47). It leads on price. MiniMax M1 80K wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Solar Pro 2 or MiniMax M1 80K?
Solar Pro 2 is cheaper at $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). MiniMax M1 80K costs $0.55 input / $2.20 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.25 per million tokens for Solar Pro 2 versus $0.963 for MiniMax M1 80K (3.9× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Solar Pro 2 has not been scored yet and MiniMax M1 80K has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Solar Pro 2 and MiniMax M1 80K yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax M1 80K has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 65,536 for Solar Pro 2. Maximum output per response: Solar Pro 2 up to 8,192, MiniMax M1 80K up to 80,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Solar Pro 2 accepts text; MiniMax M1 80K accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
MiniMax M1 80K publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Solar Pro 2 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
MiniMax M1 80K is the newest, released Jun 17, 2025. Solar Pro 2 came out May 20, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Solar Pro 2 Mar 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
