solar-mini vs Kimi K2 Instruct 0905
solar-mini comes out ahead, 50 to 38 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
Upstagesolar-mini
50/100- ECI—
- Price$0.15 / $0.15
- Context33K
Moonshot AIKimi K2 Instruct 0905
38/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.50
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
solar-mini is our pick
solar-mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 (38). It leads on price. Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest pricesolar-minisolar-mini $0.15 · Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 $1.07 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextKimi K2 Instruct 0905Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 262,144 · solar-mini 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputssolar-mini: Text · Kimi K2 Instruct 0905: Text
- Self-hostingKimi K2 Instruct 0905Publishes downloadable weights (Modified MIT)
| Measure | Weight | solar-mini | Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 85 | 46 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 0 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 50/100 | 38/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | solar-miniUpstage | Kimi K2 Instruct 0905Moonshot AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.15 (best) | $0.60 |
| Output | $0.15 (best) | $2.50 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15 (best) | $1.07 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Upstage API | Median of 12 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 4,096 tokens | 98,304 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenModified MIT |
| API model ID | solar-mini | — |
| API providers | 1 | 13 (best) |
| Released | Jun 12, 2024 | Sep 5, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Sep 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- solar-mini$1.80
- Kimi K2 Instruct 0905$11.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: solar-mini or Kimi K2 Instruct 0905?
solar-mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 (38). It leads on price. Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, solar-mini or Kimi K2 Instruct 0905?
solar-mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 costs $0.60 input / $2.50 output per million tokens (median across 12 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for solar-mini versus $1.07 for Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 (7.2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. solar-mini has not been scored yet and Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for solar-mini and Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 32,768 for solar-mini. Maximum output per response: solar-mini up to 4,096, Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 up to 98,304 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
solar-mini accepts text; Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 publishes its weights (Modified MIT) and can be self-hosted; solar-mini is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 is the newest, released Sep 5, 2025. solar-mini came out Jun 12, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: solar-mini Sep 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8BThree-way comparison
- solar-mini vs Hermes 2 Pro Llama 3 8BNous Research
- solar-mini vs Llama-3.2-11B-Vision-InstructMeta
- solar-mini vs Command RCohere
- solar-mini vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGoogle
- Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 vs Apertus 70BSwiss AI
- Kimi K2 Instruct 0905 vs GLM-4.6Z.ai (Zhipu)
