Solar Mini 4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B
Solar Mini 4 comes out ahead, 64 to 59 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
UpstageSolar Mini 4
64/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context524K
NVIDIANemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B
59/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.50
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Solar Mini 4 is our pick
Solar Mini 4 is the better all-round choice, scoring 64/100 against Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B (59). It leads on price and inputs & features. Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSolar Mini 4Solar Mini 4 $0.175 · Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B $0.275 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B 1,048,576 · Solar Mini 4 524,288 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsSolar Mini 4: Text · Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B: Text
- Self-hostingNemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Solar Mini 4 | Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 82 | 73 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 45 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 49 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 64/100 | 59/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Solar Mini 4Upstage | Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12BNVIDIA |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.10 (best) | $0.20 |
| Output | $0.40 (best) | $0.50 |
| Cached input | $0.01 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.175 (best) | $0.275 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Upstage API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 524,288 tokens | 1,048,576 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | solar-mini4 | — |
| API providers | 4 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Sep 22, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Feb 2026 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Solar Mini 4$1.80
- Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B$3.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Solar Mini 4 or Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B?
Solar Mini 4 is the better all-round choice, scoring 64/100 against Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B (59). It leads on price and inputs & features. Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Solar Mini 4 or Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B?
Solar Mini 4 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B costs $0.20 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for Solar Mini 4 versus $0.275 for Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B (1.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Solar Mini 4 has not been scored yet and Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Solar Mini 4 and Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 524,288 for Solar Mini 4. Maximum output per response: Solar Mini 4 up to 131,072, Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Solar Mini 4 accepts text; Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Solar Mini 4 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Nemotron 3.5 Super 120B A12B is the newest, released Oct 15, 2026. Solar Mini 4 came out Sep 22, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Solar Mini 4 Feb 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
