ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Solar Mini 4 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash comes out ahead, 80 to 64 and 46 on our weighted score.

  1. Upstage

    Solar Mini 4

    Released Sep 22, 2026New

    64/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.40
    • Context524K
  2. Moonshot AI

    Kimi K3.1 Pro

    Released Oct 23, 2026New

    46/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $10.00
    • Context1.05M
  3. Our pick

    Xiaomi

    MiMo-V2.6-Flash

    Released Sep 22, 2026New

    80/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.14 / $0.28
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is our pick

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 80/100 against Solar Mini 4 (64) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (46). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceSolar Mini 4 and MiMo-V2.6-FlashSolar Mini 4 $0.175 · MiMo-V2.6-Flash $0.175 · Kimi K3.1 Pro $4.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextKimi K3.1 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-FlashKimi K3.1 Pro 1,048,576 · MiMo-V2.6-Flash 1,048,576 · Solar Mini 4 524,288 tokens
  • Widest inputsMiMo-V2.6-FlashSolar Mini 4: Text · Kimi K3.1 Pro: Text, Images, Video · MiMo-V2.6-Flash: Text, Images, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingMiMo-V2.6-FlashPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightSolar Mini 4Kimi K3.1 ProMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Price50%822082
Inputs & features30%458090
Context window20%496161
Overall100%64/10046/10080/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Solar Mini 4 vs Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifications side by side
SpecificationSolar Mini 4UpstageKimi K3.1 ProMoonshot AIMiMo-V2.6-FlashXiaomi
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.10 (best)$2.00$0.14
Output$0.40$10.00$0.28 (best)
Cached input$0.01$0.20$0.0028 (best)
Blended (3:1)$0.175 (best)$4.00$0.175 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Upstage APIOfficial Moonshot AI APIOfficial Xiaomi API
Limits
Context window524,288 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoYesYes
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · maxYeslow · high · maxYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietaryOpen
API model IDsolar-mini4kimi-k3.1-promimo-v2.6-flash
API providers41723 (best)
ReleasedSep 22, 2026Oct 23, 2026Sep 22, 2026
Knowledge cutoffFeb 2026——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Solar Mini 4$1.80
  • Kimi K3.1 Pro$40.00
  • MiMo-V2.6-Flash$1.96
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Solar Mini 4, Kimi K3.1 Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 80/100 against Solar Mini 4 (64) and Kimi K3.1 Pro (46). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Solar Mini 4, Kimi K3.1 Pro or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Solar Mini 4 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price); Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2.00 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Moonshot AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for Solar Mini 4 versus $0.175 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash (1× as much) and $4.00 for Kimi K3.1 Pro (23× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Solar Mini 4 has not been scored yet, Kimi K3.1 Pro has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Solar Mini 4, Kimi K3.1 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Kimi K3.1 Pro and MiMo-V2.6-Flash have the largest context windows (1,048,576 and 1,048,576 tokens), against 524,288 for Solar Mini 4. Maximum output per response: Solar Mini 4 up to 131,072, Kimi K3.1 Pro up to 131,072, MiMo-V2.6-Flash up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Solar Mini 4 accepts text; Kimi K3.1 Pro accepts text, images and video; MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts text, images, audio and video. MiMo-V2.6-Flash handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Solar Mini 4 and Kimi K3.1 Pro is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Kimi K3.1 Pro is the newest, released Oct 23, 2026. Solar Mini 4 came out Sep 22, 2026; MiMo-V2.6-Flash came out Sep 22, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Solar Mini 4 Feb 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.