Sarvam-M vs MiniMax M1 80K
MiniMax M1 80K comes out ahead, 45 to 6 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Sarvam AI
Sarvam-M
6/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context33K
- Our pick
MiniMaxMiniMax M1 80K
45/100- ECI—
- Price$0.55 / $2.20
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
MiniMax M1 80K is our pick
MiniMax M1 80K is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against Sarvam-M (6). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMiniMax M1 80KMiniMax M1 80K $0.963 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Sarvam-M unpriced
- Longest contextMiniMax M1 80KMiniMax M1 80K 1,000,000 · Sarvam-M 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsSarvam-M: Text · MiniMax M1 80K: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Sarvam-M | MiniMax M1 80K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 10 | 35 |
| Context window | 40% | 0 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 6/100 | 45/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Sarvam-MSarvam AI | MiniMax M1 80KMiniMax |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | — | $0.55 |
| Output | — | $2.20 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.963 |
| Long-context rate | — | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Median of 5 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 80,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenApache 2.0 | OpenApache-2.0 |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | — | 5 |
| Released | May 20, 2025 | Jun 17, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Sarvam-M—
- MiniMax M1 80K$9.90
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Sarvam-M or MiniMax M1 80K?
MiniMax M1 80K is the better all-round choice, scoring 45/100 against Sarvam-M (6). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Sarvam-M or MiniMax M1 80K?
MiniMax M1 80K is cheaper at $0.55 input / $2.20 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). . At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.963 per million tokens for MiniMax M1 80K versus . Sarvam-M has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Sarvam-M has not been scored yet and MiniMax M1 80K has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Sarvam-M and MiniMax M1 80K yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Sarvam-M does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiniMax M1 80K has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 32,768 for Sarvam-M. Maximum output per response: Sarvam-M up to 32,768, MiniMax M1 80K up to 80,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Sarvam-M accepts text; MiniMax M1 80K accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (Apache 2.0 and Apache-2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
MiniMax M1 80K is the newest, released Jun 17, 2025. Sarvam-M came out May 20, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
