Saba vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Solar Pro 2
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 comes out ahead, 55 to 51 and 46 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
Mistral AISaba
46/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.60
- Context33K
- Our pickMistral AI
Voxtral Small 24B 2507
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context33K
UpstageSolar Pro 2
51/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.25
- Context66K
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is our pick
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Solar Pro 2 (51) and Saba (46). It leads on price and inputs & features. Solar Pro 2 wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceVoxtral Small 24B 2507Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.175 · Solar Pro 2 $0.25 · Saba $0.30 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextSolar Pro 2Solar Pro 2 65,536 · Saba 32,768 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsSaba and Voxtral Small 24B 2507Saba: Text, PDFs · Voxtral Small 24B 2507: Text, Audio · Solar Pro 2: Text
- Self-hostingVoxtral Small 24B 2507Publishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Saba | Voxtral Small 24B 2507 | Solar Pro 2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 72 | 82 | 75 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 45 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Overall | 100% | 46/100 | 55/100 | 51/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | SabaMistral AI | Voxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AI | Solar Pro 2Upstage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.20 | $0.10 (best) | $0.25 |
| Output | $0.60 | $0.40 | $0.25 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.30 | $0.175 (best) | $0.25 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 4 providers | Official Mistral API | Official Upstage API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 32,768 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 26,214 tokens | 32,768 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | Yesminimal · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenApache 2.0 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | voxtral-small-latest | solar-pro2 |
| API providers | 4 | 10 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Feb 17, 2025 | Jul 15, 2025 | May 20, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Sep 30, 2024 | — | Mar 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Saba$3.20
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507$1.80
- Solar Pro 2$3.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Saba, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 or Solar Pro 2?
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Solar Pro 2 (51) and Saba (46). It leads on price and inputs & features. Solar Pro 2 wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Saba, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 or Solar Pro 2?
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Solar Pro 2 costs $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price); Saba costs $0.20 input / $0.60 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for Voxtral Small 24B 2507 versus $0.25 for Solar Pro 2 (1.4× as much) and $0.30 for Saba (1.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Saba has not been scored yet, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has not been scored yet and Solar Pro 2 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Saba, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 and Solar Pro 2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Solar Pro 2 has the largest context window at 65,536 tokens, against 32,768 for Saba and 32,768 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507. Maximum output per response: Saba up to 26,214, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 up to 32,768, Solar Pro 2 up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Saba accepts text and PDFs; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 accepts text and audio; Solar Pro 2 accepts text. Saba handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Saba and Solar Pro 2 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the newest, released Jul 15, 2025. Solar Pro 2 came out May 20, 2025; Saba came out Feb 17, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Saba Sep 30, 2024, Solar Pro 2 Mar 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
