Reka Flash 3 vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 comes out ahead, 55 to 50 on our weighted score, though Reka Flash 3 is 29% cheaper per token.
Reka AIReka Flash 3
50/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.20
- Context66K
- Our pick
Mistral AIVoxtral Small 24B 2507
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.40
- Context33K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is our pick
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Reka Flash 3 (50). It leads on inputs & features. Reka Flash 3 wins on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceReka Flash 3Reka Flash 3 $0.125 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.175 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextReka Flash 3Reka Flash 3 65,536 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsVoxtral Small 24B 2507Reka Flash 3: Text · Voxtral Small 24B 2507: Text, Audio
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Reka Flash 3 | Voxtral Small 24B 2507 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 89 | 82 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 10 | 45 |
| Context window | 20% | 12 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 50/100 | 55/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Reka Flash 3Reka AI | Voxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.10 | $0.10 |
| Output | $0.20 (best) | $0.40 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.125 (best) | $0.175 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 65,536 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Max output | 58,982 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | OpenApache 2.0 |
| API model ID | — | voxtral-small-latest |
| API providers | 3 | 10 (best) |
| Released | Mar 10, 2025 | Jul 15, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 31, 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Reka Flash 3$1.40
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507$1.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Reka Flash 3 or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the better all-round choice, scoring 55/100 against Reka Flash 3 (50). It leads on inputs & features. Reka Flash 3 wins on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Reka Flash 3 or Voxtral Small 24B 2507?
Reka Flash 3 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.125 per million tokens for Reka Flash 3 versus $0.175 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507 (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Reka Flash 3 has not been scored yet and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Reka Flash 3 and Voxtral Small 24B 2507 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Reka Flash 3 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Reka Flash 3 has the largest context window at 65,536 tokens, against 32,768 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507. Maximum output per response: Reka Flash 3 up to 58,982, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Reka Flash 3 accepts text; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 accepts text and audio. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, both publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the newest, released Jul 15, 2025. Reka Flash 3 came out Mar 10, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Reka Flash 3 Jan 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Phi-4-miniThree-way comparison
- Reka Flash 3 vs Phi-4-miniMicrosoft
- Reka Flash 3 vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1NVIDIA
- Reka Flash 3 vs ERNIE 4.5 21B A3BBaidu
- Reka Flash 3 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-LiteGoogle
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash-LiteGoogle
- Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Qwen FlashAlibaba (Qwen)
