ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Reka Flash 3 vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Phi-4-mini

Too close to call on our weighted score (Phi-4-mini 56, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 55, Reka Flash 3 50). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Reka AI

    Reka Flash 3

    Released Mar 10, 2025

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.20
    • Context66K
  2. Mistral AI

    Voxtral Small 24B 2507

    Released Jul 15, 2025

    55/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.40
    • Context33K
  3. Microsoft

    Phi-4-mini

    Released Feb 26, 2025

    56/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.075 / $0.30
    • Context128K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Phi-4-mini 56/100, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 55/100, Reka Flash 3 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Reka Flash 3 on price and Phi-4-mini for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceReka Flash 3Reka Flash 3 $0.125 · Phi-4-mini $0.131 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.175 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextPhi-4-miniPhi-4-mini 128,000 · Reka Flash 3 65,536 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsVoxtral Small 24B 2507Reka Flash 3: Text · Voxtral Small 24B 2507: Text, Audio · Phi-4-mini: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightReka Flash 3Voxtral Small 24B 2507Phi-4-mini
Price50%898288
Inputs & features30%104525
Context window20%12024
Overall100%50/10055/10056/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Reka Flash 3 vs Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Phi-4-mini specifications side by side
SpecificationReka Flash 3Reka AIVoxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AIPhi-4-miniMicrosoft
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.10$0.10$0.075 (best)
Output$0.20 (best)$0.40$0.30
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.125 (best)$0.175$0.131
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 3 providersOfficial Mistral APIOfficial Azure API
Limits
Context window65,536 tokens32,768 tokens128,000 tokens (best)
Max output58,982 tokens (best)32,768 tokens4,096 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesNoNo
Tool callingNoYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenApache 2.0Open
API model ID—voxtral-small-latestphi-4-mini
API providers310 (best)2
ReleasedMar 10, 2025Jul 15, 2025Feb 26, 2025
Knowledge cutoffJan 31, 2025—Jun 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Reka Flash 3$1.40
  • Voxtral Small 24B 2507$1.80
  • Phi-4-mini$1.35
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Reka Flash 3, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 or Phi-4-mini?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Phi-4-mini 56/100, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 55/100, Reka Flash 3 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Reka Flash 3 on price and Phi-4-mini for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Reka Flash 3, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 or Phi-4-mini?

Reka Flash 3 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.20 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Phi-4-mini costs $0.075 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official Azure API price); Voxtral Small 24B 2507 costs $0.10 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.125 per million tokens for Reka Flash 3 versus $0.131 for Phi-4-mini (1× as much) and $0.175 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507 (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Reka Flash 3 has not been scored yet, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has not been scored yet and Phi-4-mini has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Reka Flash 3, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 and Phi-4-mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Reka Flash 3 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Phi-4-mini has the largest context window at 128,000 tokens, against 65,536 for Reka Flash 3 and 32,768 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507. Maximum output per response: Reka Flash 3 up to 58,982, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 up to 32,768, Phi-4-mini up to 4,096 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Reka Flash 3 accepts text; Voxtral Small 24B 2507 accepts text and audio; Phi-4-mini accepts text. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is the newest, released Jul 15, 2025. Reka Flash 3 came out Mar 10, 2025; Phi-4-mini came out Feb 26, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Reka Flash 3 Jan 31, 2025, Phi-4-mini Jun 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.