ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) vs Ministral 3 3B vs Trinity Mini

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) 72, Ministral 3 3B 72, Trinity Mini 65). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)

    Released Oct 15, 2025

    72/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.022 / $0.215
    • Context262K
  2. Mistral AI

    Ministral 3 3B

    Released Dec 2, 2025

    72/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.10
    • Context262K
  3. Arcee AI

    Trinity Mini

    Released Dec 1, 2025

    65/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.045 / $0.15
    • Context131K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) 72/100, Ministral 3 3B 72/100, Trinity Mini 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) $0.07 · Trinity Mini $0.071 · Ministral 3 3B $0.10 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) and Ministral 3 3BQwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) 262,144 · Ministral 3 3B 262,144 · Trinity Mini 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) and Ministral 3 3BQwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud): Text, Images · Ministral 3 3B: Text, Images · Trinity Mini: Text
  • Self-hostingMinistral 3 3B and Trinity MiniPublishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0 and OpenMDW-1.1)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)Ministral 3 3BTrinity Mini
Price50%10093100
Inputs & features30%506035
Context window20%373725
Overall100%72/10072/10065/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) vs Ministral 3 3B vs Trinity Mini specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)Alibaba (Qwen)Ministral 3 3BMistral AITrinity MiniArcee AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.022 (best)$0.10$0.045
Output$0.215$0.10 (best)$0.15
Cached input—$0.01—
Blended (3:1)$0.07 (best)$0.10$0.071
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens (best)262,144 tokens (best)131,072 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens262,144 tokens (best)131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenApache 2.0OpenOpenMDW-1.1
API model ID—ministral-3b-2512—
API providers111 (best)1
ReleasedOct 15, 2025Dec 2, 2025Dec 1, 2025
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud)$0.65
  • Ministral 3 3B$1.20
  • Trinity Mini$0.75
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud), Ministral 3 3B or Trinity Mini?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) 72/100, Ministral 3 3B 72/100, Trinity Mini 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud), Ministral 3 3B or Trinity Mini?

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) is cheaper at $0.022 input / $0.215 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Trinity Mini costs $0.045 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Ministral 3 3B costs $0.10 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.07 per million tokens for Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) versus $0.071 for Trinity Mini (1× as much) and $0.10 for Ministral 3 3B (1.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) has not been scored yet, Ministral 3 3B has not been scored yet and Trinity Mini has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud), Ministral 3 3B and Trinity Mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) and Ministral 3 3B have the largest context windows (262,144 and 262,144 tokens), against 131,072 for Trinity Mini. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) up to 32,768, Ministral 3 3B up to 262,144, Trinity Mini up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) accepts text and images; Ministral 3 3B accepts text and images; Trinity Mini accepts text. Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Ministral 3 3B and Trinity Mini publishes its weights (Apache 2.0 and OpenMDW-1.1) and can be self-hosted; Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Ministral 3 3B is the newest, released Dec 2, 2025. Trinity Mini came out Dec 1, 2025; Qwen3 VL Flash (Alibaba Cloud) came out Oct 15, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.