ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Mistral Large 3

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 54, Mistral Large 3 52, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base 45). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base

    Released Feb 24, 2026

    45/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.54 / $1.33
    • Context262K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.5 122B-A10B

    Released Feb 23, 2026

    54/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.40 / $3.20
    • Context262K
  3. Mistral AI

    Mistral Large 3

    Released Dec 2, 2025

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 54/100, Mistral Large 3 52/100, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base 45/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3.5 35B-A3B BaseQwen3.5 35B-A3B Base $0.739 · Mistral Large 3 $0.75 · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B $1.10 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameQwen3.5 35B-A3B Base 262,144 · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 262,144 · Mistral Large 3 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.5 35B-A3B Base and Qwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3.5 35B-A3B Base: Text, Images, Video · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B: Text, Images, Video · Mistral Large 3: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3.5 35B-A3B BaseQwen3.5 122B-A10BMistral Large 3
Price50%544653
Inputs & features30%358060
Context window20%373737
Overall100%45/10054/10052/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base vs Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Mistral Large 3 specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3.5 35B-A3B BaseAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen)Mistral Large 3Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.54$0.40 (best)$0.50
Output$1.33 (best)$3.20$1.50
Cached input——$0.05
Blended (3:1)$0.739 (best)$1.10$0.75
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens262,144 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens65,536 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoYesYesNo
ReasoningNoYesNo
Tool callingNoYesYes
Structured outputNoYesYes
Availability
WeightsOpenApache-2.0OpenOpen
API model ID—qwen3.5-122b-a10bmistral-large-2512
API providers122 (best)17
ReleasedFeb 24, 2026Feb 23, 2026Dec 2, 2025
Knowledge cutoff——Nov 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base$8.07
  • Qwen3.5 122B-A10B$10.40
  • Mistral Large 3$8.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Mistral Large 3?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3.5 122B-A10B 54/100, Mistral Large 3 52/100, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base 45/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Mistral Large 3?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base is cheaper at $0.54 input / $1.33 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Mistral Large 3 costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price); Qwen3.5 122B-A10B costs $0.40 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.739 per million tokens for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base versus $0.75 for Mistral Large 3 (1× as much) and $1.10 for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B (1.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base has not been scored yet, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has not been scored yet and Mistral Large 3 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Mistral Large 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Mistral Large 3 share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base up to 65,536, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B up to 65,536, Mistral Large 3 up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base accepts text, images and video; Qwen3.5 122B-A10B accepts text, images and video; Mistral Large 3 accepts text and images. Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache-2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Base is the newest, released Feb 24, 2026. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B came out Feb 23, 2026; Mistral Large 3 came out Dec 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Large 3 Nov 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.