Qwen3.5 122B-A10B vs Aion-2.0
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B comes out ahead, 54 to 39 on our weighted score, though Aion-2.0 is 9% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.5 122B-A10B
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.40 / $3.20
- Context262K
Aion Labs
Aion-2.0
39/100- ECI—
- Price$0.80 / $1.60
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is our pick
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against Aion-2.0 (39). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Aion-2.0 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceAion-2.0Aion-2.0 $1.00 · Qwen3.5 122B-A10B $1.10 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3.5 122B-A10B 262,144 · Aion-2.0 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.5 122B-A10BQwen3.5 122B-A10B: Text, Images, Video · Aion-2.0: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3.5 122B-A10BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.5 122B-A10B | Aion-2.0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 46 | 48 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 25 |
| Overall | 100% | 54/100 | 39/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3.5 122B-A10BAlibaba (Qwen) | Aion-2.0Aion Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.40 (best) | $0.80 |
| Output | $3.20 | $1.60 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.10 | $1.00 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Median of 3 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen3.5-122b-a10b | — |
| API providers | 22 (best) | 3 |
| Released | Feb 23, 2026 | Dec 21, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3.5 122B-A10B$10.40
- Aion-2.0$11.20
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Aion-2.0?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against Aion-2.0 (39). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Aion-2.0 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 122B-A10B or Aion-2.0?
Aion-2.0 is cheaper at $0.80 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Qwen3.5 122B-A10B costs $0.40 input / $3.20 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.00 per million tokens for Aion-2.0 versus $1.10 for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has not been scored yet and Aion-2.0 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.5 122B-A10B and Aion-2.0 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for Aion-2.0. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.5 122B-A10B up to 65,536, Aion-2.0 up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B accepts text, images and video; Aion-2.0 accepts text. Qwen3.5 122B-A10B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Aion-2.0 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.5 122B-A10B is the newest, released Feb 23, 2026. Aion-2.0 came out Dec 21, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.
