ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Luna

GPT-6 Luna comes out ahead, 83 to 73 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Meta

    Muse Spark 1.3

    Released Sep 2, 2026

    73/100
    • ECI156.9
    • Price$1.25 / $4.25
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove Muse Spark 1.3
  2. Our pick

    OpenAI

    GPT-6 Luna

    Released Sep 22, 2026

    83/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.50
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove GPT-6 Luna

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

GPT-6 Luna is our pick

GPT-6 Luna is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against Muse Spark 1.3 (73). It leads on capability and price. Muse Spark 1.3 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025), because GPT-6 Luna has no Capabilities Index score yet.

  • CapabilityGPT-6 LunaShared benchmarks: GPT-6 Luna 88.9% · Muse Spark 1.3 86.8%
  • Lowest priceGPT-6 LunaGPT-6 Luna $0.20 · Muse Spark 1.3 $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameGPT-6 Luna 1,050,000 · Muse Spark 1.3 1,048,576 tokens
  • Widest inputsMuse Spark 1.3Muse Spark 1.3: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · GPT-6 Luna: Text, Images, PDFs
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMuse Spark 1.3GPT-6 Luna
CapabilityShared benchmarks50%8789
Price25%3683
Inputs & features15%10080
Context window10%6161
Overall100%73/10083/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs GPT-6 Luna specifications side by side
SpecificationMuse Spark 1.3MetaGPT-6 LunaOpenAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)156.9—
ECI rank#17 of 148—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—90.5%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics74.4%79.0% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics99.2% (best)98.9%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions—41.4%
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25$0.10 (best)
Output$4.25$0.50 (best)
Cached input$0.15$0.01 (best)
Blended (3:1)$2.00$0.20 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateOver 272K: $0.20 / $0.75
Price sourceOfficial Meta APIOfficial OpenAI API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens1,050,000 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsYesYes
AudioYesNo
VideoYesNo
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · maxYeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model IDmuse-spark-1.3gpt-6-luna
API providers1224 (best)
ReleasedSep 2, 2026Sep 22, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—May 18, 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Muse Spark 1.3$21.00
  • GPT-6 Luna$2.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Muse Spark 1.3 or GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is the better all-round choice, scoring 83/100 against Muse Spark 1.3 (73). It leads on capability and price. Muse Spark 1.3 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025), because GPT-6 Luna has no Capabilities Index score yet.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or GPT-6 Luna?

GPT-6 Luna is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Muse Spark 1.3 costs $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for GPT-6 Luna versus $2.00 for Muse Spark 1.3 (10× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 and OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025): GPT-6 Luna 88.9% and Muse Spark 1.3 86.8%. On individual benchmarks: FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-6 Luna 79.0%, Muse Spark 1.3 74.4%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Muse Spark 1.3 99.2%, GPT-6 Luna 98.9%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Muse Spark 1.3 and GPT-6 Luna yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-6 Luna leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Their context windows are effectively the same size: Muse Spark 1.3 1,048,576 and GPT-6 Luna 1,050,000 tokens. Maximum output per response: Muse Spark 1.3 up to 131,072, GPT-6 Luna up to 128,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Muse Spark 1.3 accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; GPT-6 Luna accepts text, images and PDFs. Muse Spark 1.3 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Muse Spark 1.3 and GPT-6 Luna are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

GPT-6 Luna is the newest, released Sep 22, 2026. Muse Spark 1.3 came out Sep 2, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-6 Luna May 18, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons