ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.6

Muse Spark 1.3 comes out ahead, 73 to 65 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Meta

    Muse Spark 1.3

    Released Sep 2, 2026

    73/100
    • ECI156.9
    • Price$1.25 / $4.25
    • Context1.05M
    Full specs Remove Muse Spark 1.3

  2. xAI

    Grok 4.6

    Released Aug 12, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI156.6
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context500K
    Full specs Remove Grok 4.6

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Muse Spark 1.3 is our pick

Muse Spark 1.3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Grok 4.6 (65). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityMuse Spark 1.3Capabilities Index (ECI): Muse Spark 1.3 156.9 · Grok 4.6 156.6
  • Lowest priceMuse Spark 1.3Muse Spark 1.3 $2.00 · Grok 4.6 $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMuse Spark 1.3Muse Spark 1.3 1,048,576 · Grok 4.6 500,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsMuse Spark 1.3Muse Spark 1.3: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video · Grok 4.6: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMuse Spark 1.3Grok 4.6
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%8786
Price25%3627
Inputs & features15%10070
Context window10%6148
Overall100%73/10065/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Muse Spark 1.3 vs Grok 4.6 specifications side by side
SpecificationMuse Spark 1.3MetaGrok 4.6xAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)156.9 (best)156.6
ECI rank#17 of 148 (best)#19 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—94.0%
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics74.4% (best)66.0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics99.2%99.2%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions—49.3%
Price per million tokens
Input$1.25 (best)$2.00
Output$4.25 (best)$6.00
Cached input$0.15 (best)$0.50
Blended (3:1)$2.00 (best)$3.00
Long-context rateSame rateOver 200K: $4.00 / $12.00
Price sourceOfficial Meta APIOfficial xAI API
Limits
Context window1,048,576 tokens (best)500,000 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens500,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsYesNo
AudioYesNo
VideoYesNo
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · maxYeslow · medium · high · xhigh
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
API model IDmuse-spark-1.3grok-4.6
API providers1229 (best)
ReleasedSep 2, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Knowledge cutoff—Feb 1, 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Muse Spark 1.3$21.00
  • Grok 4.6$32.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Muse Spark 1.3 or Grok 4.6?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the better all-round choice, scoring 73/100 against Grok 4.6 (65). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.3 or Grok 4.6?

Muse Spark 1.3 is cheaper at $1.25 input / $4.25 output per million tokens (official Meta API price). Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.00 per million tokens for Muse Spark 1.3 versus $3.00 for Grok 4.6 (1.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Muse Spark 1.3 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Muse Spark 1.3 156.9 (#17 of 148) and Grok 4.6 156.6 (#19 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (154.7–159.6 vs 154.7–158.9), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Muse Spark 1.3 74.4%, Grok 4.6 66.0%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Muse Spark 1.3 99.2%, Grok 4.6 99.2%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Muse Spark 1.3 and Grok 4.6 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Muse Spark 1.3 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Muse Spark 1.3 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 500,000 for Grok 4.6. Maximum output per response: Muse Spark 1.3 up to 131,072, Grok 4.6 up to 500,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Muse Spark 1.3 accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video; Grok 4.6 accepts text and images. Muse Spark 1.3 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

No. Muse Spark 1.3 and Grok 4.6 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.

Which is newer?

Muse Spark 1.3 is the newest, released Sep 2, 2026. Grok 4.6 came out Aug 12, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Grok 4.6 Feb 1, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons