ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Mistral Medium 3 vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct comes out ahead, 62 to 53 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Mistral AI

    Mistral Medium 3

    Released May 7, 2025

    53/100
    • ECI134.1
    • Price$0.40 / $2.00
    • Context131K
  2. Our pick

    Meta

    Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct

    Released Apr 5, 2025

    62/100
    • ECI129.7
    • Price$0.225 / $0.69
    • Context10M
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is our pick

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Mistral Medium 3 (53). It leads on price and context window. Mistral Medium 3 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityMistral Medium 3Capabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Medium 3 134.1 · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7
  • Lowest priceLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct $0.341 · Mistral Medium 3 $0.80 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructLlama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 10,000,000 · Mistral Medium 3 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsMistral Medium 3: Text, Images · Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingLlama 4 Scout 17B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightMistral Medium 3Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%5852
Price25%5472
Inputs & features15%5050
Context window10%24100
Overall100%53/10062/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Mistral Medium 3 vs Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct specifications side by side
SpecificationMistral Medium 3Mistral AILlama 4 Scout 17B InstructMeta
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)134.1 (best)129.7
ECI rank#117 of 148 (best)#126 of 148
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions59.5% (best)51.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics32.2% (best)7.8%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.40$0.225 (best)
Output$2.00$0.69 (best)
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.80$0.341 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 4 providers
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens10,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output131,072 tokens (best)16,384 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpen
API model IDmistral-medium-2505—
API providers5 (best)4
ReleasedMay 7, 2025Apr 5, 2025
Knowledge cutoffMay 2025Aug 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Mistral Medium 3$8.00
  • Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct$3.63
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Mistral Medium 3 or Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Mistral Medium 3 (53). It leads on price and context window. Mistral Medium 3 wins on capability. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3 or Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct is cheaper at $0.225 input / $0.69 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers). Mistral Medium 3 costs $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.341 per million tokens for Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct versus $0.80 for Mistral Medium 3 (2.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Mistral Medium 3 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Mistral Medium 3 134.1 (#117 of 148) and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 129.7 (#126 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (130.5–135.6 vs 124.8–131.4), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Mistral Medium 3 59.5%, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 51.8%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Mistral Medium 3 32.2%, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 7.8%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Mistral Medium 3 and Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Mistral Medium 3 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct has the largest context window at 10,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Mistral Medium 3. Maximum output per response: Mistral Medium 3 up to 131,072, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Mistral Medium 3 accepts text and images; Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Mistral Medium 3 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Mistral Medium 3 is the newest, released May 7, 2025. Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct came out Apr 5, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Medium 3 May 2025, Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct Aug 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.